Cases 1 - 10 of 44
MARTIN v. MERRELL et al
as 5:2020cv00393
Plaintiff:
JAMES M MARTIN
Defendant:
CRISP REGIONAL HOSPITAL, JAMES HINTON, DEPUTY WARDEN SHENGCA KING and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Hinton v. Core Civic, Inc. et al
as 5:2020cv00088
Defendant:
Paul Grieco, Malcolm Jones, Core Civic, Inc. and others
Plaintiff:
Timothy Hinton
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
COCHRAN v. MYRICK et al
as 1:2019cv00182
Defendant:
WARDEN DESIGNEE RUSSELL HOLLMAN, DEPUTY WARDEN NATHANIEL WILLIAMS, CO BELL and others
Plaintiff:
ANTONIO BERNARD COCHRAN
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
FORD v. ZANDERS et al
as 5:2018cv00412
Defendant:
SMALL, DEPUTY WARDEN KENDARLIN MCMILLAN, COUNSELOR TINA ZANDERS and others
Plaintiff:
DANIEL LILROD FORD
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Whitman v. Hinton
as 4:2018cv00101
Plaintiff:
James Whitman
Defendant:
Bryan Keith Hinton
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
WHITMAN v. GEORGIA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS, et al
as 5:2018cv00120
Plaintiff:
JAMES WHITMAN
Defendant:
GEORGIA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS and BRYAN KEITH HINTON
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
MARTIN v. HINTON et al
as 5:2018cv00010
Plaintiff:
JAMES M MARTIN
Defendant:
HINTON, MERRELL, MABLE CHANEY and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
MARTIN v. DOOLY STATE PRISON ADMINISTRATIVE BUSINESS DEPARTMENT
as 5:2017cv00361
Plaintiff:
JAMES M MARTIN
Defendant:
DOOLY STATE PRISON ADMINISTRATIVE BUSINESS DEPARTMENT, HINTON, MERRELL and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
EHRLICH v. DOZIER et al
as 5:2017cv00348
Plaintiff:
THOMAS MATTHEW EHRLICH
Defendant:
GREGORY C DOZIER, GLEN JOHNSON, JAMES HINTON and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Mitchell v. Williams et al
as 6:2017cv00087
Plaintiff:
Michael Mitchell
Defendant:
Doug Williams, Bryan Hinton and Mercedes Daniels
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
