Cases 1 - 10 of 14
Banks v. Collier
as 1:2024cv00058
Petitioner:
Holston Banks, III
Respondent:
Bryan Collier
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Banks v. Director, TDCJ-CID
as 1:2024cv00012
Petitioner:
Holston Banks, III
Respondent:
Bryan Williams and Director, TDCJ-CID
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Holston v. United States of America
as 6:2021cv01215
Plaintiff:
Albert Holston
Defendant:
United States of America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255
Banks v. Howard County et al
as 1:2019cv00217
Defendant:
Midland County, Howard County and John H. Spence
Plaintiff:
Holston Banks, III
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Holston v. USA
as 6:2019cv00281
Petitioner:
Albert James Holston
Respondent:
USA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255
Holston v. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
as 6:2018cv00012
Petitioner:
Albert James Holston
Respondent:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate / Correct Illegal Sentenc
Holston v. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
as 6:2016cv00246
Petitioner:
Albert Holston
Respondent:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate / Correct Illegal Sentenc
Holston v. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
as 6:2016cv00047
Petitioner:
Albert James Holston
Respondent:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate / Correct Illegal Sentenc
v. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
as 6:2015cv00244
Movant:
Albert James Holston
Respondent:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate / Correct Illegal Sentenc
Holston et al v. DePuy Orthopaedics Inc et al
as 3:2015cv00863
Plaintiff:
Nelda Holston and Samuel Holston
Defendant:
DePuy Orthopaedics Inc , DePuy Inc , DePuy International Limited and others
Pecial_master:
Special Master
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
