Cases 1 - 8 of 8
HOME EXPRESSIONS, INC. v. KETER LUXEMBOURG, SARL
as 2:2022cv03230
Plaintiff:
HOME EXPRESSIONS, INC.
Defendant:
KETER LUXEMBOURG, SARL
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1125 Trademark Infringement (Lanham Act)
HOME EXPRESSIONS, INC. v. KETER LUXEMBOURG, SARL
as 3:2022cv03230
Plaintiff:
HOME EXPRESSIONS, INC.
Defendant:
KETER LUXEMBOURG, SARL
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1125 Trademark Infringement (Lanham Act)
GARCIA v. HOME EXPRESSIONS, INC.
as 3:2021cv05998
Defendant:
HOME EXPRESSIONS, INC.
Plaintiff:
CENIA GARCIA
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 2601
GARCIA v. HOME EXPRESSIONS, INC. et al
as 2:2021cv05998
Defendant:
HOME EXPRESSIONS, INC. and JOHN DOES 1-5 AND 6-10
Plaintiff:
CENIA GARCIA
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 2601
CURVER LUXEMBOURG, SARL v. HOME EXPRESSIONS INC.
as 2:2017cv04079
Plaintiff:
CURVER LUXEMBOURG, SARL
Defendant:
HOME EXPRESSIONS INC.
Cause Of Action: 35 U.S.C. § 271
INTERLINK PRODUCTS INTERNATIONAL, INC. v. HOME EXPRESSIONS, INC.
as 2:2015cv01718
Defendant:
HOME EXPRESSIONS, INC.
Plaintiff:
INTERLINK PRODUCTS INTERNATIONAL, INC.
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1121
Murillo Modular Group Ltd et al v. The Warrior Group Inc et al
as 3:2007cv01551
Plaintiff:
Murillo Modular Group Ltd and Apple Mobile Home Express Inc
Defendant:
The Warrior Group Inc, The Warrior Group Inc, The Warrior Group Inc and others
Cause Of Action: 40 U.S.C. § 270 Miller Act
Murrillo Modular Group, Ltd. v. The Warrior Group, Inc. et al
as 3:2007cv00010
Plaintiff:
Murillo Modular Group, Ltd. and Apple Mobile Home Express, Inc.
Defendant:
The Warrior Group, Inc., The Warrior Group, Inc., The Warrior Group, Inc. and others
Counter Plaintiff:
The Warrior Group, Inc., The Warrior Group, Inc., The Warrior Group, Inc. and others
Counter Defendant:
Murillo Modular Group, Ltd., The Warrior Group, Inc., The Warrior Group, Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 40 U.S.C. § 270 Miller Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
