Cases 41 - 50 of 283
SHAFFER v. PHILBIN et al
as 1:2017cv00181
Plaintiff:
JOHNNIE WILLARD SHAFFER, JR
Defendant:
EDWARD PHILBIN, JERRY JEFFERSON, HOMER BRYSON and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Clark v. Dozier et al
as 6:2017cv00125
Plaintiff:
Jason J. Clark
Defendant:
Gregory Dozier, Homer Bryson, Timothy Ward and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Waseem Daker v. Homer Bryson, et al
as 17-14209
Plaintiff - Appellant:
WASEEM DAKER
Defendant - Appellee:
HOMER BRYSON, TIMOTHY WARD, JACK KOON and others
Edgar Quintanilla v. Otis Stanton, et al
as 17-14141
Plaintiff - Appellant:
EDGAR QUINTANILLA
Defendant - Appellee:
OTIS STANTON, In his individual and official capacity, DOUG WILLIAMS, In his individual and official capacity, ERIC SMOKES, Tier II Unit Manager, in his individual and official capacity and others
Waseem Daker v. Homer Bryson, et al
as 17-14066
Plaintiff - Appellant:
WASEEM DAKER
Defendant - Appellee:
HOMER BRYSON, Commissioner, BRIAN OWENS, Former Commissioner, TIMOTHY WARD, Assistant Commissioner and others
BRADFORD v. DOZIER et al
as 5:2017cv00321
Plaintiff:
JAY BRADFORD
Defendant:
GREGORY C DOZIER, HOMER BRYSON, GREGORY MCLAUGHLIN and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Reid v. Crickmar et al
as 4:2017cv00190
Plaintiff:
Travion Reid
Defendant:
Scott Crickmar, Randy Reed, Alisa Hammock and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
CARD, et al v. DOE et al
as 5:2017cv00310
Plaintiff:
STEPHEN W CARD, DARREN LAMOTTE, LEVI ARTHUR FEDD and others
Defendant:
JOHN DOE, CORRECTIONAL OFFICER, CORRECTIONAL DOCTORS and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
BENNING v. DEAL et al
as 1:2017cv00152
Plaintiff:
RALPH HARRISON BENNING
Defendant:
NATHAN DEAL, HOMER BRYSON, CARLTON POWELL and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
BENNING v. DEAL et al
as 5:2017cv00306
Plaintiff:
RALPH HARRISON BENNING
Defendant:
NATHAN DEAL, HOMER BRYSON, CARLTON POWELL and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
