Cases 1 - 10 of 10
Foy-Hooker v. GlaxoSmithKline (America) Inc. et al
as 3:2023cv22940
Plaintiff:
Ava Foy-Hooker
Defendant:
GlaxoSmithKline LLC, GlaxoSmithKline PLC and GlaxoSmithKline (America) Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Hooker v. BOEHRINGER INGELHEIM PHARMACEUTICALS, INC., et al
as 9:2020cv81428
Defendant:
SANOFI US SERVICES INC, CHATTEM, INC, GlaxoSmithKline LLC and others
Plaintiff:
Allen Hooker
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Churilla et al v. Ford Motor Company
as 1:2019cv24734
Plaintiff:
Ida Gonzales, Zvonimir Burin, Daniel Detaranto and others
Defendant:
Ford Motor Company
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 2301 Magnuson-Moss Warranty Act
Bank of Camden v. Hooker et al
as 2:2017mc14377
Plaintiff:
Bank of Camden
Defendant:
Michael R Hooker and Talmadge Knight
Cause Of Action: Registration of Foreign Judgment
Hooker et al v. Aspen Specialty Insurance Company
as 0:2017cv61109
Plaintiff:
Ralph Hooker and Coreen Kelley
Defendant:
Aspen Specialty Insurance Company
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Hooker Gordon v. NCL (Bahamas) Ltd.
as 1:2014cv21478
Plaintiff:
Rodolfo Hooker Gordon
Defendant:
NCL (Bahamas) Ltd.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Executive Diesel Marine, LLC v. M/Y Island Hooker
as 0:2013cv60418
Plaintiff:
Executive Diesel Marine, LLC
Defendant:
M/Y Island Hooker
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1333 Admiralty - Services Rendered
Hooker v. NCL Bahamas Ltd.
as 1:2012cv21666
Defendant:
NCL Bahamas, Ltd.
Plaintiff:
Steve Hooker
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Chapman v. United States [central] government
as 0:2011cv61969
Plaintiff:
Christopher Chapman and Roanne Eye
Defendant:
United States [central] government, Federico A. Moreno, Rick Scott and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983
Hooker v. Bayer Corporation et al
as 9:2009cv80241
Defendant:
Bayer Corporation, Bayer Healthcare LLC, Bayer Healthcare Pharmaceuticals Inc. and others
Plaintiff:
Carter L. Hooker III
Cause Of Action: Diversity
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
