Cases 1 - 10 of 14
Hoskins v. United States of America
as 6:2023cv02054
Petitioner:
Walter Hoskins, III
Respondent:
United States of America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate / Correct Illegal Sentenc
Booker v. Anamosa State Penitentiary et al
as 1:2022cv00065
Plaintiff:
Christian Storm Booker
Defendant:
Anamosa State Penitentiary, Kristofer Karberg, Deputy Warden and others
Interested Party:
H Loraine Wallace
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Booker v. Anamosa State Penitentiary et al
as 4:2022cv00221
Plaintiff:
Christian Storm Booker
Defendant:
Anamosa State Penitentiary, Kristofer Karberg, Deputy Warden and others
Interested Party:
H. Loraine Wallace
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Hoskins v. United States of America
as 4:2017cv00228
Petitioner:
Richard Lavern Hoskins
Respondent:
United States of America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255
Hoskins v. United States of America
as 4:2016cv00577
Petitioner:
Richard Lavern Hoskins
Respondent:
United States of America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255
Hoskins v. United States of America
as 6:2014cv02040
Petitioner:
Walter Hoskins, III
Respondent:
United States of America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255
Hoskins v. Fayram
as 1:2013cv00035
Plaintiff:
Walter Hoskins
Defendant:
John Fayram
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Hoskins v. United States of America
as 4:2011cv00301
Petitioner:
Richard Lavern Hoskins
Respondent:
United States of America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255
Hoskins v. Ruper
as 4:2009cv00005
Plaintiff:
Larry Hoskins
Defendant:
Ruper
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Hoskins v. Snap-On Incorporated Retirement Plan
as 3:2008cv03069
Plaintiff:
Dean A Hoskins and Dean A Hoskins
Defendant:
Snap-On Incorporated Retirement Plan
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
