Cases 1 - 10 of 75
Hoskins v. Hiland et al
as 2:2023cv00346
Plaintiff:
LaDarrius Hoskins
Defendant:
Hiland, Ethan Stark, Ashley Haseleu and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Hall v. Adams et al
as 2:2023cv00101
Plaintiff:
Stephen Hall and Stephen A Hall
Defendant:
Lt Adams, Lt Chamberlain, CO Hoskins and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Hall v. Burgess et al
as 2:2022cv00901
Plaintiff:
Stephen Hall
Defendant:
Lt Burgess, CO Holzhueter, CO Cowell and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Hoskins v. Ertl et al
as 2:2022cv00873
Plaintiff:
James Hoskins
Defendant:
Christopher Ertl, Owen Piotrowski, Thomas Deboer and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Hoskins v. State of Wisconsin
as 2:2022cv00874
Petitioner:
James Hoskins
Respondent:
State of Wisconsin
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federal)
Hoskins, Michael v. Propson, Emily et al
as 3:2021cv00488
Plaintiff:
Michael S. Hoskins
Defendant:
Deputy Warden Emily Propson, Warden Hepp, Capt. Bauer and others
Not Classified By Court:
WCI Prison Facility
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Hoskins, Michael v. Evers, Tony et al
as 3:2021cv00260
Defendant:
Warden Hepp, Administrator Maka Fessahaye and Governor Tony Evers
Plaintiff:
Michael S. Hoskins
Not Classified By Court:
WCI Prison Facility
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Hoskins v. Evers et al
as 2:2021cv00492
Defendant:
Tony Evers, Warden Hepp and Maka Fessahaye
Plaintiff:
Michael S Hoskins
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Hoskins v. Barrett
as 2:2021cv00485
Plaintiff:
Michael S Hoskins
Defendant:
Sgt Barrett
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Hoskins, Michael v. Hepp, Randall et al
as 3:2021cv00102
Defendant:
Lt. Burns and Randall R. Hepp
Plaintiff:
Michael S. Hoskins
Not Classified By Court:
WCI Prison Facility
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
