Cases 1 - 5 of 5
Sanofi-Aventis, et al v. Food and Drug Administration, et al
as 09-5278
Plaintiff - Appellant:
Sanofi-Aventis, Sanofi-Aventis U.S. LLC and Debiopharm S.A.
Defendant - Appellee:
Food & Drug Administration, Margaret Hamburg and Kathleen Sebelius, Secretary of Health and Human Services
Intervenor For Defendant - Appellee:
Teva Parenteral Medicines, Inc., Teva Pharmaceutical Industries Ltd., Hospira Australia, Pty Ltd., doing business as Mayne Pharma Limited, doing business as Mayne Pharma (USA) Inc. and others
SANOFI-AVENTIS et al v. FOOD AND DRUG ADMINISTRATION et al
as 1:2009cv01495
Plaintiff:
SANOFI-AVENTIS, SANOFI-AVENTIS, SANOFI-AVENTIS U.S. LLC and others
Defendant:
FOOD AND DRUG ADMINISTRATION, MARGARET A. HAMBURG and KATHLEEN SEBELIUS
Movant:
TEVA PARENTERAL MEDICINES, INC., TEVA PHARMACEUTICALS USA, INC, PHARMACHEMIE B.V. and others
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 0706 Judicial Review of Agency Actions
SANOFI-AVENTIS V SANDOZ INC
as 09-1427
Defendant:
Abraxis Bioscience, Inc. (formerly known as Astrazeneca Phar, Actavis Group hf., Actavis Totowa LLC and others
Defendant-Appellee:
Barr Laboratories, Inc., Fresenius Kabi Oncology Plc (f/k/a Dabur Oncology plc), Fresenius Kabi Pharma Limited (f/k/a/ Dabur Pharma Limited) and others
Plaintiff-Appellant:
Debiopharm S.A., Sanofi-Aventis and Sanofi-Aventis U.S. LLC
SANOFI-AVENTIS U.S. LLC et al v. MAYNE PHARMA LIMITED et al
as 3:2007cv04550
Plaintiff:
SANOFI-AVENTIS U.S. LLC, SANOFI-AVENTIS and DEBIOPHARM, S.A.
Defendant:
MAYNE PHARMA LIMITED, MAYNE PHARMA (USA) INC., HOSPIRA AUSTRALIA PTY LTD. and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1126 Patent Infringement
SANOFI-AVENTIS U.S. LLC et al v. SANDOZ, INC.
as 3:2007cv02762
Defendant:
MUSTAFA NEVZAT ILAC SANAYII A.S., SANDOZ, INC., TEVA PARENTERAL MEDICINES, INC. and others
Plaintiff:
SANOFI-AVENTIS U.S. LLC, SANOFI-AVENTIS and DEBIOPHARM, S.A.
Cause Of Action: 35 U.S.C. § 271 Patent Infringement
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
