Cases 1 - 10 of 11
Devin Coleman, et al v. William Ngwa, et al
as 24-1877
Plaintiff:
DEVIN L. COLEMAN
Defendant:
WILLIAM NGWA, Provider (at JTVCC), JASVIR KAUR, Provider (at Howard R. Young Correctional Institute "HRYCI"), SHATYRA HENDERSON-HAMWRIGHT, Provider (at HRYCI) and others
Kostyshyn et al v. Carney et al
as 1:2021cv01419
Plaintiff:
Mr. Peter Theodore Kostyshyn, Ms. P.R. Kostyshyn and Peter Theodore Kostyshyn
Defendant:
John Carney, John Doe, Akinbayo Kolawole and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Bryant v. HRYCI Mental Health Department
as 1:2016cv00613
Plaintiff:
Jonathan Bryant
Defendant:
HRYCI Mental Health Department
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Bridgeforth v. Howard R. Young Correctional Instiution Medical Department Staff et al
as 1:2014cv01206
Plaintiff:
Otis Michael Bridgeforth
Defendant:
Howard R. Young Correctional Instiution Medical Department Staff, HRYCI Senior Medcial Supervisor, HRYCI Inmate Movement Coordinator and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Biddle v. Morgan et al
as 1:2013cv00343
Plaintiff:
Wayne Biddle
Defendant:
Phillip Morgan, Emig Smith, Jones and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Diaz v. HRYCI et al
as 1:2012cv00165
Plaintiff:
Avalon Diaz
Defendant:
HRYCI, Pedrick Allen and M Krdick
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Diaz v. HRYCI et al
as 1:2011cv01076
Plaintiff:
Avalon Diaz
Defendant:
HRYCI, Pedrick Allen and M. Krolick
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Kostyshyn v. Pedrick et al
as 1:2011cv00022
Plaintiff:
Peter Kostyshyn
Defendant:
Allen Pedrick, John W. Polk, Jane/John Doe and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Giles v. HRYCI Quick Response Team
as 1:2009cv00316
Plaintiff:
Wardell Leroy Giles
Defendant:
HRYCI Quick Response Team
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Sexton v. State Of Delaware
as 1:2007cv00539
Plaintiff:
Larry M. Sexton
Defendant:
State Of Delaware and HRYCI
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
