Cases filed in the Second Circuit Courts
Cases 11 - 20 of 227
McCormack v. Dingdong (Cayman) Ltd. et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 1:2022cv07273
Plaintiff: Ryan McCormack
Defendant: Dingdong (Cayman) Ltd., Changlin Liang, Le Yu and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 77 Securities Fraud
Zaerpour v. UBS Group AG et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 1:2022cv07232
Plaintiff: Scheil Zaerpour and Soheil Zaerpour
Defendant: UBS Group AG, Bank of America Corporation, Bank of America, N.A. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
HSBC Bank PLC v. Coalition Development Ltd et al
as 3:2022mc00042
Respondent: COALITION DEVELOPMENT LTD and GREENWICH ASSOCIATES LLC
Petitioner: HSBC BANK PLC, HSBC NORTH AMERICA HOLDINGS INC., HSBC BANK USA, N.A. and others
In re: Treasury Securities Auc
as 22-943
Plaintiff: Arkansas Teacher Retirement System, Beaver County Employees' Retirement Fund, individually and on behalf of all others similarly situated, Marc Federighi, individually and on behalf of all those similarly situated and others
Defendant / Appellee: Michael St. John, BNP Paribas Securities Corp., Bank of Nova Scotia, New York Agency and others
Plaintiff / Appellant: City of Pontiac Police and Fire Retirement System, On behalf of itself and on behalf of all others similarly situated, Cleveland Bakers and Teamsters Pension Fund, on behalf of themselves and all others similarly situated, Cleveland Bakers and Teamsters Health and Welfare Fund, on behalf of themselves and all others similarly situated and others
Defendant: BMO Capital Markets Corp., CIBC World Markets Corp., Cantor Fitzgerald & Co. and others
Arkansas Teacher Retirement System v. Clarivate Plc et al
as 1:2022cv01372
Plaintiff: Arkansas Teacher Retirement System
Defendant: Clarivate Plc, Jerre Stead, Richard Hanks and others
Petitioner: Pension Trust Fund for Operating Engineers
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 77 Securities Fraud
Contant v. Bank of America Corporation
as 22-159
Plaintiff / Appellee: James Contant, on behalf of themselves and all others similarly situated, Martin-Han Tran, on behalf of themselves and all others similarly situated, Carlos Gonzalez, on behalf of themselves and all others similarly situated and others
Petitioner / Appellant: AMA Capital Management, LLC
Defendant: Bank of America Corporation, Bank of America, N.A., Merrill Lynch, Pierce, Fenner & Smith Inc. and others
Petitioner: FXDirectDealer, LLC (FXDD)
Contant v. Bank of America Corporation
as 22-19
Plaintiff / Appellee: James Contant, on behalf of themselves and all others similarly situated, Martin-Han Tran, on behalf of themselves and all others similarly situated, Carlos Gonzalez, on behalf of themselves and all others similarly situated and others
Petitioner / Appellant: AMA Capital Management, LLC
Defendant: Bank of America Corporation, Bank of America, N.A., Merrill Lynch, Pierce, Fenner & Smith Inc. and others
Petitioner: FXDirectDealer, LLC (FXDD)
Contant v. Bank of America Corporation
as 21-3058
Plaintiff / Appellee: James Contant, on behalf of themselves and all others similarly situated, Martin-Han Tran, on behalf of themselves and all others similarly situated, Carlos Gonzalez, on behalf of themselves and all others similarly situated and others
Petitioner / Appellant: AMA Capital Management, LLC
Defendant: Bank of America Corporation, Bank of America, N.A., Merrill Lynch, Pierce, Fenner & Smith Inc. and others
Petitioner: FXDirectDealer, LLC (FXDD)
Hechler v. Didi Global Inc. et al
as 1:2021cv07550
Plaintiff: CORY HECHLER
Defendant: DIDI GLOBAL INC. F/K/A XIAOJU KUAIZHI INC., WILL WEI CHENG, ALAN YUE ZHUO and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 sv Fed. Question: Securities Violation
Jatin Chopra v. Didi Global Inc. et al
as 1:2021cv05973
Plaintiff: Jatin Chopra
Defendant: Didi Global Inc.f/k/a Xiaoju Kuaizhi Inc., Barclays Capital Inc., Boci Asia Limited and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 77 Securities Fraud

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?