Cases 61 - 70 of 104
Branson et al v. Carrier IQ, Inc et al
as 5:2012cv00305
Plaintiff:
Matthew Branson , Kathryn Graffman and Jason Simons
Defendant:
Carrier IQ, Inc , HTC Corporation, HTC America, Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Katz v. Carrier IQ, Inc. et al
as 2:2012cv00091
Defendant:
Carrier IQ, Inc., HTC America, Inc. and HTC, Inc.
Plaintiff:
Jay Katz
Cause Of Action: APPLICATION FOR INTERCEPTION OF WIRE OR ORAL COMMUNICATIONS
Kleer v. Carrier IQ, Inc. et al
as 5:2011cv06630
Plaintiff:
Robert Kleer
Defendant:
Carrier IQ, Inc., HTC Corp and HTC America, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Jackson v. Carrier IQ, Inc. et al
as 1:2011cv02772
Plaintiff:
Mario Jackson
Defendant:
Carrier IQ, Inc. and HTC America, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Allan v. Carrier IQ, Inc et al
as 5:2011cv06613
Plaintiff:
Michael Allan
Defendant:
Carrier IQ, Inc, HTC Corporation and HTC America, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Lucarelli v. Carrier IQ Inc et al
as 3:2011cv03483
Plaintiff:
Richard Lucarelli
Defendant:
Carrier IQ Inc , HTC Corporation and HTC America Inc
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 2511
Briggs v. Carrier IQ, Inc. et al
as 4:2011cv06338
Plaintiff:
Laureen Briggs
Defendant:
Carrier IQ, Inc., HTC Corporation, HTC America, Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Phong v. Carrier IQ, Inc et al
as 5:2011cv06333
Plaintiff:
Dao Phong
Defendant:
Carrier IQ, Inc and HTC America, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Yastrab v. Carrier IQ, Inc. et al
as 2:2011cv06069
Defendant:
Carrier IQ, Inc. and HTC America, Inc.
Plaintiff:
David Yastrab
Cause Of Action: APPLICATION FOR INTERCEPTION OF WIRE OR ORAL COMMUNICATIONS
Siegel v. Carrier IQ, Inc. et al
as 1:2011cv08791
Plaintiff:
Michael Siegel
Defendant:
Carrier IQ, Inc., Sprint-Nextel Corporation, Samsung Electronics America Inc and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
