Cases 1 - 10 of 14
Lomax v. Hutchins et al
as 2:2023cv01284
Plaintiff:
Nathan Louis Lomax
Defendant:
William Hutchins, Gabriela Najera and Bob Faulkner
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Nix v. Lopez et al
as 2:2023cv00796
Plaintiff:
Jason Nathaniel Nix
Defendant:
Brayan Lopez and William Hutchins
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Greene v. State of Nevada et al
as 2:2023cv00739
Plaintiff:
Marshall C. Greene
Defendant:
State of Nevada, Nevada Department of Corrections, Charles Daniels and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Mule v. NDOC Staff et al
as 2:2023cv00083
Plaintiff:
Joseph L. Mule
Defendant:
NDOC Staff, Dr. Omadoc, Dr. Rio and others
Interested Party:
Nevada Attorney General and nevada department of corrections
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Andress-Tobiasson v. Nevada Commission on Judicial Discipline et al
as 2:2021cv00381
Defendant:
Adam Wygnanski, Nevada Commission on Judicial Discipline, Bruce Hahn and others
Plaintiff:
Melanie Andress-Tobiasson
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Pineda v. Daniels et al
as 2:2020cv02311
Defendant:
Mailroom Supervisor, William Hutchins and Charles Daniels
Plaintiff:
Ray Pineda
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Pineda v. Hutchins et al
as 2:2020cv02312
Respondent:
William Hutchins and Attorney General of the State of Nevada
Petitioner:
Ray Pineda
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Robbins v. Hutchins et al
as 2:2020cv02087
Respondent:
Hutchins and Attorney General of the State of Nevada
Petitioner:
Darin Scott Robbins
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Hutchins v. People of the State of California
as 2:2014ms00009
Claimant:
Clifton Hutchins, Jr.
Respondent:
People Of The State Of California
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2012cv01063
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692 Fair Debt Collection Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
