Cases 1 - 10 of 16
Kamal v. Swinnea Enterprise, Inc. et al
as 3:2022cv00208
Plaintiff:
Mostafa Kamal
Defendant:
Swinnea Enterprise, Inc. doing business as Swinnea Food Mart, Habibur Rahman and Syed Akram Hossain
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201 Fair Labor Standards Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2022cv02896
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1361 Petition for Writ of Mandamus
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2022cv02732
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1361 Petition for Writ of Mandamus
Rahman et al v. United States of America
as 1:2022cv00004
Plaintiff:
Muhammed Mizanor Rahman and Mohammed Habibur Rahman
Defendant:
United States of America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2671 Federal Tort Claims Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2021cv10707
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Arman et al v. JN Saipan CNMI, LLC et al
as 1:2021cv00024
Plaintiff:
Mohammad Arman, Adul Kalam Azad, Kowsar Halim and others
Defendant:
JN Saipan CNMI, LLC, Big Boy Marine Sports, Inc., MD. Jashim Uddin and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 18-1065
Plaintiff - Appellant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant - Appellee:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Star Cable NA, Inc. v. Lalon TV, Inc. et al
as 2:2017cv04469
Defendant:
Syed S. Ahmed, Shahidul Bari, Ahmodul Barobhuiya and others
Plaintiff:
Star Cable NA, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 47 U.S.C. § 605 Unauthorized publication or use of communications
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2017cv01669
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Asia TV USA, Ltd. v. Total Cable LLC et al
as 1:2016cv06873
Plaintiff:
Asia TV USA, Ltd.
Defendant:
Total Cable LLC, Ahmodul Barobhuiya, Habibur Rahman and others
Cause Of Action: 17 U.S.C. § 101
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
