Cases 1 - 10 of 10
DiMaio v. Wexford Health Sources, Inc. et al
as 1:2022cv00902
Plaintiff:
Tony F. DiMaio
Defendant:
Wexford Health Sources, Inc., Patricia Burke, County of Kane and others
Petitioner:
Andrew Lee Flowers, Jr.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Rickey Haines v. Putnamville Correctional Facil
as 21-2462
Plaintiff / Appellant:
RICKEY D. HAINES
Defendant / Appellee:
PUTNAMVILLE CORRECTIONAL FACILITY
Titus Henderson v. Cathy Jess, et al
as 21-1585
Defendant / Appellee:
CATHY JESS, LORIE IVERSON, VICKI SEBASTAIN and others
Plaintiff / Appellant:
TITUS HENDERSON
Libertarian Party of Illinois, et al v. William Cadigan, et al
as 20-1961
Defendant / Appellant:
CASSANDRA B. WATSON, individual member of the Illinois State Board of Elections, IAN LINNABARY, individual member of the Illinois State Board of Elections, KATHERINE O'BRIEN, individual member of the Illinois State Board of Elections and others
Plaintiff / Appellee:
LIBERTARIAN PARTY OF ILLINOIS, SHELDON SCHAFER, KYLE K. KOPITKE and others
Haines v. Capital One Bank (USA), N.A.
as 1:2012cv10144
Plaintiff:
Charles Haines
Defendant:
Capital One Bank (U.S.A), N.A.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question
IN RE: FAILURE TO COMPLY
as 1:2012mc00053
In Re:
FAILURE TO COMPLY WITH CONTINUING LEGAL EDUCATION REQUIREMENTS AND/OR NONPAYMENT OF ATTORNEY REGISTRATION FEES
Respondent:
PHILIP LYNN CARSON, EDWIN HENRY FISHER, JR., TODD EDWIN HAINES and others
Franklin v. Lowe et al
as 1:2012cv00667
Plaintiff:
Tom Franklin
Defendant:
Thomas W. Lowe, Susan Haines, Julie A. Rousswlow and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2010cv00207
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1681
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2010cv02584
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1681
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
