Cases 1 - 7 of 7
HAINES v. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
as 1:2022cv07461
Petitioner:
RICHARD HAINES
Respondent:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
ROBERTS v. CAMDEN COUNTY, NEW JERSEY et al
as 1:2019cv16563
Defendant:
BURLINGTON COUNTY SHERIFF'S OFFICE, SUPERIOR COURT OF NEW JERSEY BURLINGTON COUNTY, CAMDEN COUNTY DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS and others
Plaintiff:
MICHAEL HENRY ROBERTS
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
HAINES v. CAMDEN COUNTY CORRECTIONAL FACILITY
as 1:2016cv08165
Plaintiff:
MATTHEW HAINES
Defendant:
CAMDEN COUNTY CORRECTIONAL FACILITY
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
OLIVER et al v. DEPARTMENT OF HUMAN SERVICES, SPECIAL TREATMENT UNIT et al
as 2:2009cv05336
Plaintiff:
LORENZO OLIVER, EDWARD SALERNO, DOUGLAS MINATEE and others
Defendant:
DEPARTMENT OF HUMAN SERVICES, SPECIAL TREATMENT UNIT, DR. MERRIL MAIN, CLERKE BRUNO and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
HAINES v. JACK DOES 1-40 et al
as 2:2007cv05387
Plaintiff:
CHARLES HAINES
Defendant:
JACK DOES 1-40 and JANE DOES 1-40
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
BANDA et al v. CORZINE, et al
as 2:2007cv04508
Plaintiff:
BANDA, FRANK SANCHEZ, EDWARD SALERNO and others
Defendant:
JON CORZINE, GEORGE HAYMAN, JOHN DOE and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
COSTA v. COUNTY OF BURLINGTON et al
as 1:2007cv00904
Plaintiff:
ROBERT J. COSTA, JR.
Defendant:
COUNTY OF BURLINGTON, BURLINGTON MEDICAL CENTER, P.A., NATHANIEL R. EVANS, II and others
Cross Claimant:
BURLINGTON MEDICAL CENTER, P.A., NATHANIEL R. EVANS, II, JAMES K. WUJCIK and others
Cross Defendant:
JAMES K. WUJCIK, BURLINGTON COUNTY DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS, JULES COLE and others
Counter Claimant:
BURLINGTON MEDICAL CENTER, P.A. and NATHANIEL R. EVANS, II
Counter Defendant:
JAMES K. WUJCIK, BURLINGTON COUNTY DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS, JULES COLE and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
