Cases 1 - 10 of 16
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 6:2023cv01366
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101 American Disabilities Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2023cv00153
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Bailey-Lynch v. JcPenny Hair Salon et al
as 1:2022cv00472
Plaintiff:
Yvonne Bailey-Lynch
Defendant:
JcPenny Hair Salon, Shaniqua and Ken
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2022cv02573
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101 The Americans with Disabilities Act of 1990
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2021cv06703
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Antonio Hair Salon Corp. v. AmGuard Insurance Company
as 1:2021cv02815
Plaintiff:
Antonio Hair Salon Corp. doing business as Sampson & Delilah
Defendant:
AmGuard Insurance Company
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Notice of Removal
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2021cv02726
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Cardoso v. Studio 34 Hair Salon, Inc. et al
as 1:2019cv09684
Defendant:
Studio 34 Salon Inc., Garik Rakhamimov, Studio 34 Hair Salon, Inc. and others
Plaintiff:
Marcela Cardoso
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201
Salon Phoenix Corp. v. Phoenix Hair Salon, Inc.
as 1:2017cv06335
Defendant:
Phoenix Hair Salon, Inc.
Plaintiff:
Salon Phoenix Corp.
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1125 Trademark Infringement (Lanham Act)
Daniels v. Jean Pierre Hair Salon, Incorporated
as 1:2017cv01399
Plaintiff:
Hanit Daniels
Defendant:
Jean Pierre Hair Salon, Incorporated
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 207
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
