Cases 1 - 8 of 8
Molina v. Stout NYC Hospitality Group Inc. et al
as 1:2026cv05433
Defendant:
Stout NYC Hospitality Group Inc., Whelan Brothers Management Group, Inc., Amity Street, Inc. doing business as Amity Hall Downtown and others
Plaintiff:
Rogelio Molina
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201 Fair Labor Standards Act
Half Pint Taproom & Restoration Hall Half Pint III, LLC v. Atain Specialty Insurance Company
as 7:2026cv00059
Plaintiff:
Half Pint Taproom & Restoration Hall Half Pint III, LLC
Defendant:
Atain Specialty Insurance Company
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-(Citizenship)
Marquina v. Stout NYC Hospitality Group Inc. et al
as 1:2025cv03867
Plaintiff:
Manuel Marquina and Luis Garcia
Defendant:
Stout NYC Hospitality Group Inc. formerly doing business as Whelan Brothers Management Group, Inc., Amity Street, Inc. doing business as Amity Hall Downtown, Amity Hall Uptown Inc. doing business as Amity Hall Uptown and others
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201 Fair Labor Standards Act
United States of America v. Rivera (Amador Rivera)
as 24-3305
Defendant:
JOSE TORRES, WILLIAM ALBERT, RAMON COLLAZO and others
:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
United States of America v. Rivera
as 24-2074
Defendant:
JORGE RIVERA, GEDEON TORRES, PHILLIP KLOSKOWSKI and others
:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2023cv09598
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12188 Americans With Disabilities Act - Civil Enforcement Actions
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2018cv09865
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
United States of America v. Rivera (Rivera)
as 11-3119
Appellee USA:
United States of America
Defendant:
Jorge Rivera, AKA G, AKA Pekino, William Mendez, Vincent Major, AKA Moe, AKA Moe-D and others
Defendant - Appellant:
Amador Rivera, Jr., AKA Beast
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
