Cases 1 - 10 of 310
Wilson v. Top 40 Express Inc. et al
as 2:2024cv00318
Plaintiff:
Carla Wilson
Defendant:
Top 40 Express Inc. and Gregory Hale
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Motor Vehicle Product Liability
Sanders v. Ward et al
as 7:2024cv00027
Defendant:
Heather W. Pederson, Ingrid Y. Ward, Gregory S. Hicks and others
Plaintiff:
James E Sanders
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Hale v. Kroger Texas LP
as 3:2024cv00501
Plaintiff:
Kayla Hale
Defendant:
Kroger Texas LP doing business as Kroger #588
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-(Citizenship)
Royal v. Gregg County et al
as 6:2023cv00622
Plaintiff:
Devin Benard Royal
Defendant:
Gregg County, Jeffery K. Hale and Gregg County District Clerk
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 s Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Devaney v. Blankenship et al
as 4:2023cv01052
Plaintiff:
David Allen Devaney, Sr.
Defendant:
Chief FNU Blankenship, Captain FNU Gordy, Sgt. FNU Hale and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2023cv00163
Petitioner:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Respondent:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Hallcy v. Hale County Commissioners et al
as 5:2023cv00177
Plaintiff:
Mark DeWayne Hallcy
Defendant:
Hale County Commissioners, David Mull, Wally Hatch and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Hale v. Hyatt Corporation
as 4:2023cv02791
Plaintiff:
Melissa Hale
Defendant:
Hyatt Corporation
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Personal Injury
Hale v. Davis et al
as 6:2023cv00669
Plaintiff:
James Ray Hale
Defendant:
Helen Maree Davis and Lee Raymond Reid
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-(Citizenship)
Applied US Energy, Inc. v. Hale et al
as 6:2023cv00036
Plaintiff:
Applied US Energy, Inc. doing business as Knox Oil Field Supply
Defendant:
Harvey Hale and CP&S, Inc. doing business as Cowboy Pump & Supply
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
