Cases 21 - 30 of 34
Antrio Hammond v. USA
as 17-1961
Petitioner - Appellant:
ANTRIO D. HAMMOND, also known as HARD ROCK
Respondent - Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Mitchell Alicea v. Aubrey Thomas, et al
as 15-1255
Plaintiff - Appellant:
MITCHELL ALICEA
Defendant - Appellee:
AUBREY THOMAS, ALEJANDRO ALVAREZ and CITY OF HAMMOND, INDIANA, a Municipal Corporation
Lois Trask v. Edgar Rodriguez, et al
as 14-2601
Plaintiff - Appellant:
LOIS TRASK
Defendant - Appellee:
EDGAR RODRIGUEZ, ANTWAN SULLIVAN, HORSESHOE HAMMOND, LLC and others
William Brandt, Jr. v. Horseshoe Hammond, LLC
as 14-2174
Debtor:
In the Matter of: EQUIPMENT ACQUISITION RESOURCES, INCORPORATED
Plaintiff - Appellant:
WILLIAM A. BRANDT, JR., not individually but solely in his capacity as Plan Administrator for EQUIPMENT ACQUISITION RESOURCES, INC.
Defendant - Appellee:
HORSESHOE HAMMOND, LLC, also known as HORSESHOE CASINO HAMMOND
Yaodi Hu v. William Lee
as 14-1975
Petitioner:
YAODI HU
Respondent:
WILLIAM C. LEE
Party-in-Interest:
AMTRAK, LAKE COUNTY, INDIANA, CITY OF WHITING, Indiana and others
USA v. Wesley Hammond
as 11-2632
Plaintiff - Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant - Appellant:
WESLEY S. HAMMOND
USA v. Antrio Hammond
as 11-2552
Plaintiff - Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant - Appellant:
ANTRIO D. HAMMOND, also known as HARD ROCK
Gloria Swanson v. Horseshoe Hammond, LLC
as 11-1983
Plaintiff - Appellant:
GLORIA E. SWANSON
Defendant - Appellee:
HORSEHOE HAMMOND LLC, doing business as HORSESHOE CASINO HAMMOND
Gloria Swanson v. Hammond Police Departmen, et al
as 10-3629
Plaintiff - Appellant:
GLORIA E. SWANSON
Defendant - Appellee:
HAMMOND CITY POLICE DEPARTMENT, DAN SANGKARATANA, Officer, BOYZIE COULTER, Officer and others
USA v. Michael Hammond
as 10-3104
Plaintiff - Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant - Appellant:
MICHAEL D. HAMMOND
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
