Cases 1 - 10 of 42
Salem v. Burns et al
as 1:2024cv21509
Plaintiff:
Skylar Salem
Defendant:
William Burns, Chicago Police, Central Intelligence Agency and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question
PASULO v. HANCOCK WHITNEY BANK et al
as 3:2023cv24660
Plaintiff:
ANTONIO PASULO
Defendant:
HANCOCK WHITNEY BANK, CHRISTOPHER ESTRADE, FATULA SLAUGHTER and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 8:2023cv00629
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1681 Fair Credit Reporting Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 8:2022cv00905
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1681 Fair Credit Reporting Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 8:2022cv00904
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1681 Fair Credit Reporting Act
Hancock County Land Acquisitions, LLC v. USA, et al
as 21-12508
Plaintiff / Appellant:
HANCOCK COUNTY LAND ACQUISITIONS, LLC
Defendant / Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, INTERNAL REVENUE SERVICE, CATHERINE C. BROOKS, Internal Reveune Service Manager and others
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 8:2020cv02615
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1681
Miller v. Wolfe Jones Wolfe Hancock Daniel & South LLC
as 4:2020cv01642
Plaintiff:
Paulette E Miller
Defendant:
Wolfe Jones Wolfe Hancock Daniel & South LLC
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2020cv03589
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1681
Hancock County Land Acquisitions, LLC v. United States of America et al
as 1:2020cv03096
Plaintiff:
Hancock County Land Acquisitions, LLC
Defendant:
Catherine C. Brooks, The Internal Revenue Service, United States of America and others
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 702
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
