Cases 21 - 30 of 31
Hanjin Shipping Co Ltd. v. CNJ International Inc.
as 2:2009cv06909
Plaintiff:
Hanjin Shipping Co Ltd. and Hanjin Shipping Co Ltd.
Defendant:
CNJ International Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1333 Admiralty
The Continental Insurance Company v. Hanjin Shipping Co Ltd. et al
as 2:2009cv06457
Plaintiff:
The Continental Insurance Company and The Continental Insurance Company
Defendant:
Hanjin Shipping Co Ltd., Dolphin Logistics Co. Ltd., International Freight Express (HK) Ltd. and others
Cause Of Action: 46 U.S.C. § 1701 Shipping/Maritime
People of the State of California, Department of Fish and Game et al v. Regal Stone Ltd. et al
as 3:2009cv01469
Plaintiff:
People of the State of California, Department of Fish and Game, People of the State of California, Department of Fish and Game, People of the State of California ex rel., California Regional Water Quality Control Board, San Francisco Bay Region and others
Defendant:
Regal Stone Ltd., Regal Stone Ltd., Regal Stone Ltd. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal
Starbucks Corporation v. Hanjin Shipping Co. Ltd et al
as 2:2009cv01230
Plaintiff:
Starbucks Corporation
Defendant:
Hanjin Shipping Co. Ltd, Hanjin Shipping Co. Ltd, Kawasaki Kisen Kaisha, Ltd and others
Cross Claimant:
Hanjin Shipping Co. Ltd
Cross Defendant:
Kawasaki Kisen Kaisha, Ltd, Kawasaki Kisen Kaisha, Ltd and Kawasaki Kisen Kaisha, Ltd
ThirdParty Plaintiff:
Hanjin Shipping Co., Ltd. and Hanjin Shipping Co., Ltd.
ThirdParty Defendant:
Hanjin Shipping Co., Ltd.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Notice of Removal - Breach of Contract
People of the State of California v. Regal Stone, Ltd. et al
as 3:2008cv02268
Plaintiff:
People of the State of California
Defendant:
Regal Stone, Ltd., Hanjin Shipping Co Ltd, Conti Cairo KG and others
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Peterson v. Islamic Republic of Iran
as 3:2008mc80030
Plaintiff:
Deborah D. Peterson
Defendant:
Islamic Republic of Iran
Garnishee:
Clearstream Banking, S.A.
Petitioner:
World Bank
3Rd Party Defendant:
Japan Bank for International Cooperation, Non-Party CMA CGM, Non-Party A.P. Moller-Maersk A/S and others
Interested Party:
The Export-Import Bank of Korea, Deutsche Bank Trust Company Americas, ABN AMRO Bank N.V. and others
Amicus Curiae:
California Bankers Association, the Institute of International Bankers, the International Bankers Association in California and others
Not Classified By Court:
International Finance Corporation
Shogren Living Trust et al v. Regal Stone, Ltd. et al
as 3:2007cv05926
Plaintiff:
Shogren Living Trust, Shogren Living Trust, Patrick Davis and others
Defendant:
Regal Stone, Ltd., Hanjin Shipping Co. Ltd., John Cota and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Chelsea, LLC v. Regal Stone, Ltd. et al
as 3:2007cv05800
Plaintiff:
Chelsea, LLC, Chelsea, LLC, Chelsea, LLC and others
Defendant:
Regal Stone, Ltd., Hanjin Shipping, Co., Ltd. and China Ocean Shipping Company
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Cybex International, Inc. v. Hanjin Shipping Co., Ltd. et al
as 2:2007cv05996
Plaintiff:
Cybex International, Inc.
Defendant:
Hanjin Shipping Co., Ltd. and BNSF Railway Company
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Mitsui Sumitomo Insurance Co Ltd v. Hanjin Shipping Co Ltd et al
as 2:2007cv04074
Plaintiff:
Mitsui Sumitomo Insurance Co Ltd
Defendant:
Hanjin Shipping Co Ltd, Hanjin Shipping Co Ltd, Expeditors International of Washington Inc and others
Cross Claimant:
Total Terminals International LLC, Total Terminals International LLC, Expeditors International of Washington Inc and others
Cross Defendant:
Marine Terminals Corporation, Hanjin Shipping Co Ltd, Total Terminals International LLC and others
ThirdParty Defendant:
Laca Express, Inc. and LACA Express Inc
ThirdParty Plaintiff:
Total Terminals International LLC, Total Terminals International LLC and Marine Terminals Corporation
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Notice of Removal
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
