Cases 1 - 10 of 14
Joe Hand Promotions, Inc. v. Shay et al
as 3:2024cv00117
Plaintiff:
Joe Hand Promotions, Inc.
Defendant:
Chaddwic W Shay, christopher L Shay and One Eye Open LLC doing business as Hank's Local
Cause Of Action: 47 U.S.C. § 553 Unauthorized Reception of Cable Service
Thomas Ison v. David Kline, et al
as 21-2986
Plaintiff / Appellant:
THOMAS D. ISON
Defendant:
DAVID KLINE
Defendant / Appellee:
OFFICER KEVIN JEROME and BRIAN HANKS, Police Officer
USA v. Gary Thompson
as 20-5685
Defendant / Appellant:
GARY HANK THOMPSON
Plaintiff / Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Michigan Republican Party, et al v. Jocelyn Benson
as 19-2420
Plaintiff / Appellant:
DORIAN THOMPSON, HANK VAUPEL, LAURA COX and others
Defendant / Appellee:
JOCELYN BENSON, in her official capacity as Secretary of State
Intervenor / Appellee:
COUNT MI VOTE, doing business as Voters Not Politicians
Aten et al v. General Motors LLC et al
as 1:2019cv11366
Plaintiff:
Luanne Edelman, Mark Files, Terry Christian and others
Defendant:
General Motors LLC, Robert Bosch GmbH and Robert Bosch LLC
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 1962
Steven Hank v. Great Lakes Construction Co, et al
as 19-3118
Defendant / Appellee:
LOCAL 18 INTERNATIONAL UNION OF OPERATING ENGINEERS, GREAT LAKES CONSTRUCTION COMPANY and CARE WORKS CONSULTING, INC.
Plaintiff / Appellant:
STEVEN M. HANK
Cunningham v. Mitchell et al
as 3:2017cv00392
Plaintiff:
Craig Cunningham
Defendant:
Eastern Legal Services, Paul Hank, Karl Kepper and others
Cause Of Action: 47 U.S.C. § 227
USA v. Joell Hanks, Jr.
as 16-1621
Plaintiff - Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant - Appellant:
JOELL LAWRENCE HANKS, JR.
In re: Henry Jordan
as 15-6311
Movant:
In re: HENRY JORDAN, aka Hank Jordan, aka Henry Broadwell, aka Douglas Henry Broadwell
Respondent:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2015cv01007
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
