Cases 1 - 10 of 23
Kirby v. Hanks
as 5:2024cv00124
Plaintiff:
David L. Kirby, III
Defendant:
Brandon Hanks
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2023cv02662
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12132 Americans with Disabilities Act - Discrimination
Eggsware v. Google et al
as 1:2022cv00868
Plaintiff:
Shawn Eggsware
Defendant:
Google, Instagram, Stefani Joanne Angelina Germanotta and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Mongielo et al v. Hochul et al
as 1:2022cv00116
Plaintiff:
David Mongielo, April Bueg, Fava Jessi and others
Petitioner:
Jessica Bogdanoff
Defendant:
Kathleen Hochul, Mary T Bassett, Betty A Rosa and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Hanks v. City of Syracuse et al
as 5:2021cv00921
Plaintiff:
Brandon Hanks
Defendant:
City of Syracuse, Kenton Buckner, Deputy Chief Richard Trudell and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981 Civil Rights
Kirby v. Hanks et al
as 5:2021cv00886
Plaintiff:
David L. Kirby, III
Defendant:
B. Hanks, J. Harriman and R. Solis
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Brinkmann et al v. Town of Southold, New York
as 2:2021cv02468
Plaintiff:
Mattituck 12500 LLC, Hank Brinkmann and Ben Brinkmann
Defendant:
Town of Southold and Town of Southold, New York
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Robar v. Village of Potsdam Board of Trustees et al
as 8:2020cv00972
Defendant:
Village of Potsdam Board of Trustees, Lisa Newby, Gregory L. Thompson and others
Plaintiff:
Frederick Hank Robar
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Tual v. Town of Montgomery et al
as 7:2020cv01594
Defendant:
Sgt. John Hank, John Doe Police Officers, Town of Montgomery and others
Plaintiff:
Wyatt Tual
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 cv
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2019cv01920
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 ed
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
