Cases 1 - 8 of 8
Jane Doe v. Louisiana Department of Justice, et al
as 22-35853
Plaintiff / Appellant:
JANE DOE
Defendant / Appellee:
LOUISIANA DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE, STATE OF LOUISIANA, CITY OF BATON ROUGE, and Parish of East Baton Rouge and others
Jane Doe v. USDC-ORPIn re: Jane Doe v. USDC-ORP
as 22-70230
Not Classified By Court:
In re: JANE DOE, LOUISIANA DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE, STATE OF LOUISIANA and others
Petitioner:
JANE DOE
Respondent:
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF OREGON, PORTLAND
Jane Doe v. Louisiana Department of Justice, et al
as 22-35752
Plaintiff / Appellant:
JANE DOE
Defendant / Appellee:
LOUISIANA DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE, RACKETEER INFLUENCED AND CORRUPT STATE OF LOUISIANA, CITY OF BATON ORGANIZATIONS ACT AND ROUGE AND PARISH OF EAST BATON ROUGE and others
Jane Doe v. City of Baton Rouge, et al
as 22-35572
Plaintiff / Appellant:
JANE DOE
Defendant / Appellee:
CITY OF BATON ROUGE, CITY OF BATON ROUGE POLICE DEPARTMENT, JAMES WEBER and others
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 22-15161
Plaintiff / Appellant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant / Appellee:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Mauricio Godoy v. Edmund Brown, Jr., et al
as 19-17499
Defendant / Appellee:
JEAN WEISS, MCSP-Md.-ADA-Associate Warden, GENEVIE CANDELARIA, CIM-Education, Supervisor, W. VAUGHN, LL&S, State Official, CDCR and others
Defendant:
UCC-CIM-ICC, INSTITUTIONAL CLASSIFICATION COMMITTEE, J. ANDRES, DDP-Prison Guard Sgt., VINCENT S. CULLEN, Dir. Correct.Ser.-CDCR and others
Plaintiff / Appellant:
MAURICIO JOSE GODOY, AKA Maurice Godoy
Diallo Uhuru v. P. Hart, et al
as 09-56879
Plaintiff - Appellant:
DIALLO E. UHURU, Min.
Defendant - Appellee:
P. HART, J. JOSLYN, D. ENGLER and others
Defendant:
N. GRANNIS
David J. Lashgari, et al v. William J. Bratton, et al
as 09-56289
Plaintiff - Appellant:
DAVID T. LASHGARI and MARJE H. LASHGARI
Defendant - Appellee:
WILLIAM J. BRATTON, LAPD, Chief, J NICHOLSON, JOHN LEBERKNIGHT and others
Defendant:
JOHN ERDERT, JOHN FERRIS, STEVE COOLEY and others
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
