Cases 21 - 30 of 124
SALEH v. HOLDER et al
as 1:2010cv01197
Petitioner:
MOHAMMED SALEH
Respondent:
ERIC HOLDER and HARLEY LAPPIN
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
BARNETT v. AUGUSTINE et al
as 1:2010cv00788
Plaintiff:
LEWIS CARL BARNETT
Defendant:
PAIGE AUGUSTINE, JEFF CARSON, HARRELL WATTS and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
DEBREW v. ATWOOD et al
as 1:2010cv00650
Plaintiff:
DARRELL JAMES DEBREW
Defendant:
ATWOOD, ALL FORMER TRUST FUND MANAGERS, HARLEY LAPPIN and others
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 552 Freedom of Information Act
AREF et al v. HOLDER et al
as 1:2010cv00539
Plaintiff:
YASSIN MUHIDDIN AREF , AVON TWITTY , DANIEL MCGOWAN and others
Defendant:
ERIC HOLDER, HARLEY LAPPIN, D. SCOTT DODRILL and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Other Civil Rights
STINE v. LAPPIN
as 1:2010mc00228
Plaintiff:
MIKEAL GLENN STINE
Defendant:
HARLEY LAPPIN
Cause Of Action: Civil Miscellaneous Case
MIZELL v. FEDERAL BUREAU OF PRISONS et al
as 1:2010cv00437
Plaintiff:
ROBERT MIZELL
Defendant:
FEDERAL BUREAU OF PRISONS, HARLEY LAPPIN, ROMAN and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
SNELLGROVE v. LAPPIN et al
as 1:2010cv00433
Plaintiff:
WESLEY SNELLGROVE
Defendant:
HARLEY LAPPIN, BRUCE PEARSON and T. MASON
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
HILL v. LAPPIN et al
as 1:2010cv00367
Plaintiff:
DEMETRIUS HILL
Defendant:
HARLEY LAPPIN, REGIONAL DIRECTORS OVER SPECIAL MANAGEMENT UNITS, U.S.P. SPECIAL HOUSING UNITS and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
GONZALES v. OBAMA et al
as 1:2010cv00277
Petitioner:
ANGEL GONZALES
Respondent:
BARACK OBAMA, HARLEY LAPPIN, D. SCOTT DODRILL and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
TAYLOR v. LAWSON et al
as 1:2010cv00229
Plaintiff:
OSCAR L. TAYLOR
Defendant:
ANGELA LAWSON, MELISSA BURGESS, MONIQUE FREENEY and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
