Cases 21 - 30 of 63
Flynn v. Edenfield et al
as 1:2010cv00096
Petitioner:
Billy Ray Flynn
Respondent:
Karen Edenfield, Harley Lappin, Eric Holder and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
MIZELL v. FEDERAL BUREAU OF PRISONS et al
as 1:2010cv00070
Plaintiff:
Robert E. Mizell
Defendant:
Federal Bureau of Prisons, Harley Lappin, WARDEN EDENFIELD and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Schlotzhauer v. Edenfield et al
as 1:2010cv00063
Petitioner:
Rick R. Schlotzhauer
Respondent:
Karen Edenfield, Harley Lappin, Eric Holder and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Marquez v. Hall et al
as 6:2010cv00029
Petitioner:
Jose Angel Fernandez Marquez
Respondent:
Keith E. Hall, Eric Holder and Harley Lappin
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 5:2010cv00036
Petitioner:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Respondent:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1361 Petition for Writ of Mandamus
Cook v. Lappins
as 7:2010cv00013
Petitioner:
John Lee. Cook
Respondent:
Director Harley Lappins
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Mizell v. Edenfield et al
as 1:2010cv00020
Petitioner:
Robert E. Mizell
Respondent:
Karen Edenfield and Harley Lappin
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus
Watts v. Lappin et al
as 1:2009cv00930
Plaintiff:
Michael L Watts
Defendant:
Harley Lappin, Tim Outlaw, Bruce Sasser and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Bivens Act
Gessa v. Holder et al
as 6:2009cv00081
Petitioner:
Alexander Raymond Gessa
Respondent:
Eric Holder, Harley Lappin and Keith Hall
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federal)
Gessa v. Holder et al
as 3:2009cv01861
Petitioner:
Alexander Raymond Gessa
Respondent:
Eric Holder, Harley Lappin and Keith Hall
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federal)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
