Cases 51 - 60 of 63
Martin v. Gonzales et al
as 1:2008cv00198
Petitioner:
Anthony . Brian Martin
Respondent:
Alberto Gonzales and Harley Lappin
Cause Of Action: U.S. Government Defendant
Jones v. Lappin
as 1:2008cv00090
Petitioner:
James Jones
Respondent:
Harley Lappin
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Cannon v. Lappin et al
as 1:2008cv00071
Plaintiff:
Gregory L. Cannon
Defendant:
Harley Lappin, United States of America and UP Fox
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Personal Injury
Jones v. Gonzales et al
as 1:2008cv00014
Plaintiff:
Kacey D Jones
Defendant:
Alberto Gonzales, Harley Lappin and Department of Justice
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Wallace v. Gonzales et al
as 6:2008cv00003
Petitioner:
Joel Lee Wallace
Respondent:
Alberto Gonzales and Harley Lappin
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Wallace v. Gonzales et al
as 1:2008cv00001
Petitioner:
Joel Lee Wallace
Respondent:
Alberto Gonzales and Harley Lappin
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Valliere v. Gonzales et al
as 1:2007cv00829
Petitioner:
Demond S. Valliere
Respondent:
Alberto Gonzales and Harley Lappin
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Valliere v. Gonzales et al
as 6:2007cv00505
Petitioner:
Demond S. Valliere
Respondent:
Alberto Gonzales and Harley Lappin
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Ford v. Lappin et al
as 4:2007cv00617
Plaintiff:
Brenda Lee Ford
Defendant:
Harley Lappin, G Maldonado and E Mejia
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Other Civil Rights
Flores v. Gonzales et al
as 1:2007cv00692
Petitioner:
Ruben Flores
Respondent:
Alberto Gonzales and Harley Lappin
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
