Cases 1 - 10 of 27
Roark v. Individuals of the Federal Bureau of Prisons, former and current et al
as 5:2012cv00060
Plaintiff:
Benjamin A Roark
Defendant:
Individuals of the Federal Bureau of Prisons, former and current, Eric Holder, Alberto Gonzales and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Murray v. Lappin
as 1:2012cv00093
Petitioner:
Greg Murray
Respondent:
Harley Lappin
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Mahone v. Adduci et al
as 1:2010cv00693
Plaintiff:
Michael A Mahone
Defendant:
Jon Adduci, G. Maldonado, Jr., Harrell Watts and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 5:2010cv00036
Petitioner:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Respondent:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1361 Petition for Writ of Mandamus
Watts v. Lappin et al
as 1:2009cv00930
Plaintiff:
Michael L Watts
Defendant:
Harley Lappin, Tim Outlaw, Bruce Sasser and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Bivens Act
Okpala v. Lappin et al
as 1:2009cv00828
Plaintiff:
Okey Garry Okpala
Defendant:
Harley Lappin, John B. Fox, Constanle Reese and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Bivens Act
Murray v. Battles et al
as 1:2009cv00133
Petitioner:
Greg Murray
Respondent:
S. Battles, G. Maldonado, Jr., B. A. Rhodes and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Downs v. Federal Bureau of Prisons et al
as 1:2009cv00134
Petitioner:
John Wentzell Downs
Respondent:
Federal Bureau of Prisons, Harley Lappin and John Fox
Cause Of Action: U.S. Government Defendant
Flowers v. Lappin et al
as 1:2008cv00653
Plaintiff:
Anthony C Flowers
Defendant:
Harley Lappin, Gene Malanando, Greg Hershberger and others
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
SMITH v. GONZALES et al
as 1:2008cv00634
Petitioner:
RENARD DEWAYNE SMITH
Respondent:
Alberto Gonzales, Harley Lappin and Francisco Quintana
Cause Of Action: U.S. Government Defendant
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
