Cases 61 - 70 of 195
Cotton v. Graham
as 9:2016cv00731
Petitioner:
Maurice Cotton
Respondent:
Harold Graham
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Scott v. Graham
as 1:2016cv03218
Respondent:
Superintendent Harold Graham
Petitioner:
Hakim Scott
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
McMillian v. Graham et al
as 9:2016cv00522
Plaintiff:
Herman Carlee McMillian
Defendant:
Harold Graham and John Does 1 through 10
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
McMillian v. Graham et al
as 1:2016cv02205
Defendant:
Superintendent Harold Graham, John Does 1 through 10, District Attorney Robert Thomas Johnson and others
Plaintiff:
Herman Carlee McMillian
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Allen v. Graham
as 1:2016cv01285
Petitioner:
Carl Allen
Respondent:
Harold Graham
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
McMillian v. Graham et al
as 9:2016cv00277
Plaintiff:
Herman Carlee McMillian
Defendant:
Harold Graham, David Walters and Robert Thomas Johnson
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
McMillian v. Graham et al
as 1:2016cv00869
Defendant:
Superintendent Harold Graham, District Attorney Robert Thomas Johnson and Correctional Officer David Walters
Plaintiff:
Herman Carlee McMillian
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Washington v. Graham
as 1:2016cv00072
Petitioner:
D'Allyn E. Washington
Respondent:
Harold Graham
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Zimmerman et al v. Todd et al
as 9:2015cv01437
Plaintiff:
Nicholas Zimmerman
Defendant:
T. Todd, Joseph Wolczyk, Harold Graham and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Williams v. Chuttey et al
as 9:2015cv01278
Plaintiff:
Wonder Williams
Defendant:
Brian Chuttey, Harold Graham and Albert Prack
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
