Cases 121 - 130 of 150
Tyler v. Wickham et al
as 3:2017cv00114
Defendant:
James Dzurenda and Harold Wickham
Plaintiff:
Germandi Tyler
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Jackson v. Wickham et al
as 3:2017cv00098
Petitioner:
Wayne A Jackson
Respondent:
Nevada Attorney General and Harold Wickham
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Stott v. Wickham et al
as 3:2017cv00081
Respondent:
Nevada Attorney General, Nevada, State Of and Harold Wickham
Petitioner:
Philip Stott
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Houseman v. Papke et al
as 3:2017cv00031
Defendant:
James E. Dzurenda, Papke, Vidaurri and others
Plaintiff:
Roy Houseman
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Rosaschi v. Endel et al
as 3:2016cv00723
Defendant:
Tony Corda, Dwayne Deal, James Dzurenda and others
Plaintiff:
Jamie Rosaschi
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Howard v. Wickham et al
as 3:2016cv00665
Petitioner:
Lamont Howard
Respondent:
Nevada Attorney General and Harold Wickham
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Miranda-Rivas v. Wickham et al
as 3:2016cv00663
Petitioner:
Jorge Miranda-Rivas
Respondent:
Nevada Attorney General and Harold Wickham
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Jones v. Wickham et al
as 3:2016cv00645
Plaintiff:
Monroe Jones
Defendant:
Lisa Walsh, Jessie Welty and Harold Wickham
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Miranda-Rivas v. Wickham et al
as 3:2016cv00549
Petitioner:
Jorge Miranda-Rivas
Respondent:
Nevada Attorney General and Harold Wickham
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Rosaschi v. Wickham et al
as 3:2016cv00442
Respondent:
Nevada Attorney General and Harold Wickham
Petitioner:
Jamie Rosaschi
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
