Cases 31 - 40 of 138
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2018cv01679
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1361
LEOTIE v. BAYVIEW LOAN SERVICING, LLC et al
as 1:2018cv01521
Defendant:
RUBIN LUBIN, OCWEN MORTGAGE, NATURES POINT HOMEOWNERS ASSOCIATION and others
Plaintiff:
ABYOKE LEOTIE and KEISHA JONES
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
ARIZONA REGIONAL MEDICAL CENTER et al v. AZAR II
as 1:2018cv01367
Plaintiff:
ARIZONA REGIONAL MEDICAL CENTER , ASANTE ROGUE VALLEY MEDICAL CENTER , AUGUSTA UNIVERSITY MEDICAL CENTER and others
Defendant:
ALEX M. AZAR, II
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 0706
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2018cv01149
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1361
HARRISON v. MALDENADO et al
as 1:2018cv01163
Plaintiff:
CHARLES RANDALL HARRISON
Defendant:
RAUL MALDENADO, UNITED STATES OF AMERICA and JOHN DOE
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
KHATANA v. WASHINGTON METROPOLIAN AREA TRANSIT AUTHORITY
as 1:2018cv00854
Plaintiff:
DEBORAH HARRISON KHATANA
Defendant:
WASHINGTON METROPOLIAN AREA TRANSIT AUTHORITY
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2018cv00539
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1361
BI et al v. NIELSEN et al
as 1:2018cv00429
Plaintiff:
DA BI , JINGHANG HU , JIE LU and others
Defendant:
KIRSTJEN M. NIELSEN , L. FRANCIS CISSNA , JULIA HARRISON and others
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 0706
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2018cv00279
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1361
BRYANT v. DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA GOVERNMENT et al
as 1:2018cv00176
Plaintiff:
RONNIE LEON BRYANT
Defendant:
DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA GOVERNMENT, METROPOLITAN POLICE DEPARTMENT, SARAH R. BUC and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
