Cases 41 - 50 of 142
GOVERNMENT EMPLOYEES INSURANCE CO. et al v. ULTIMED HEALTH CARE, P.C. et al
as 3:2018cv16887
Plaintiff:
GOVERNMENT EMPLOYEES INSURANCE CO., GEICO INDEMNITY CO., GEICO CASUALTY CO. and others
Defendant:
HONG SIK PAK, M.D., RAED A. HATTAB, M.D., ULTIMED HEALTH CARE, P.C. and others
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 1962
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2018cv15355
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1681
Harrison v. KapStone Paper and Packaging Corporation et al
as 1:2018cv01210
Defendant:
John M. Chapman, Roger W. Stone, Matthew Kaplan and others
Plaintiff:
Todd Harrison
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 78
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2018cv00916
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1681
In re: J. C.
as 18-1142
Plaintiff - Petitioner:
In re: J. C., individually and all others similarly situated
Defendant - Respondent:
NICHOLAS FORD, STEFFEN BOYD, JOSETTE SPRINGER and others
Nominal Respondent:
C. DARNELL JONES, II
HARRISON v. FBOP
as 2:2017mc00093
BRG HARRISON LOFTS URBAN RENEWAL LLC v. GENERAL ELECTRIC COMPANY et al
as 2:2016cv06577
Plaintiff:
BRG HARRISON LOFTS URBAN RENEWAL LLC
Defendant:
GENERAL ELECTRIC COMPANY, ENVIRONMENTAL WASTE MANAGEMENT ASSOCIATES, LLC and ACCREDITED ENVIRONMENTAL TECHNOLOGIES, INC.
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 9613
INTERNATIONAL UNION OF OPERATING ENGINEERS LOCAL 825 EMPLOYEE BENEFIT FUNDS AND THE TRUSTEES THEREOF v. HARRISON EQUIPMENT CO.
as 2:2016cv06252
Petitioner:
INTERNATIONAL UNION OF OPERATING ENGINEERS LOCAL 825 EMPLOYEE BENEFIT FUNDS AND THE TRUSTEES THEREOF
Respondent:
HARRISON EQUIPMENT CO.
Cause Of Action: 9 U.S.C. § 9
In re: William Harrison
as 16-2905
Petitioner:
In re: WILLIAM HARRISON
Respondent:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
In re: Christopher Harrison
as 16-2789
Petitioner:
In re: CHRISTOPHER HARRISON
Respondent:
DISTRICT ATTORNEY PHILADELPHIA
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
