Cases 41 - 50 of 121
Harrison v. Ethicon, Inc. et al
as 2:2014cv20929
Plaintiff:
Pauline Harrison
Defendant:
Ethicon, Inc. and Johnson & Johnson
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Harrison v. C. R. Bard, Inc.
as 2:2014cv20659
Plaintiff:
Huey S. Harrison
Defendant:
C. R. Bard, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Harrison-Watts v. Ethicon, Inc. et al
as 2:2014cv20477
Plaintiff:
Julia Harrison-Watts
Defendant:
Ethicon, Inc. and Johnson & Johnson
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Harrison et al v. Ethicon, Inc. et al
as 2:2014cv19031
Plaintiff:
Lois Virginia Harrison and Richard Harrison
Defendant:
Ethicon, Inc., Johnson & Johnson and American Medical Systems, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Harrison et al v. Boston Scientific Corporation
as 2:2014cv18359
Plaintiff:
Kay F. Harrison and Gary McLemore
Defendant:
Boston Scientific Corporation
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Harrison et al v. C. R. Bard, Inc.
as 2:2014cv17862
Plaintiff:
Judy Harrison and Anthony Harrison
Defendant:
C. R. Bard, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Harrison et al v. C. R. Bard, Inc. et al
as 2:2014cv16641
Plaintiff:
Sondra Harrison and Timothy Harrison
Defendant:
C. R. Bard, Inc. , Tissue Science Laboratories Limited and American Medical Systems, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Harrison et al v. American Medical Systems, Inc.
as 2:2014cv13819
Plaintiff:
Fran Harrison and James Harrison
Defendant:
American Medical Systems, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Harrison et al v. Boston Scientific Corporation
as 2:2014cv11733
Plaintiff:
Cheri Harrison and Frank Harrison
Defendant:
Boston Scientific Corporation
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Harrison et al v. C. R. Bard, Inc. et al
as 2:2014cv11092
Plaintiff:
Eilleen Harrison and Bret Harrison
Defendant:
C. R. Bard, Inc., Tissue Science Laboratories Limited, Ethicon, Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
