Cases 61 - 70 of 224
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 6:2020cv01073
Respondent:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Petitioner:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1361
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 6:2020cv00827
Respondent:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Petitioner:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1361
Harrison v. 3M Company, The et al
as 2:2020cv00382
Defendant:
Dynax Corporation, Dupont De Nemours Inc, Buckeye Fire Equipment Company and others
Plaintiff:
Jill Harrison
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Harrison v. USA
as 8:2019cv03321
Respondent:
USA
Petitioner:
Andrew Tyrone Harrison
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255
Logan v. Commissioner of Social Security Administration
as 6:2019cv02435
Plaintiff:
Pamela Harrison Logan
Defendant:
Commissioner of Social Security Administration
Interested Party:
Social Security Administrative Record
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 416
Harrison v. Commissioner Social Security Administration
as 6:2019cv01614
Plaintiff:
Marshall Eugene Harrison
Defendant:
Commissioner Social Security Administration
Interested Party:
Social Security Administration Record
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405
HARRISON v. UNITED STATES
as 2:2019cv00947
Defendant:
United States
Plaintiff:
JONATHAN HARRISON
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2671
Richardson v. City of North Charleston et al
as 2:2019cv00758
Defendant:
Unknown City of North Charleston/NCPD Patrol Officer/Officers, Edward Brodsky, Unknown City of North Charleston official/officials and others
Plaintiff:
Harrison Richardson
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Bourne v. Harmon
as 3:2019cv00671
Plaintiff:
Harrison Bourne and Whit Bourne
Defendant:
April Hodge Harmon
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Vance v. 8th Circuit Public Defenders Office et al
as 8:2019cv00191
Defendant:
Chelsea McNeil, Tristan Shaffer, 8th Circuit Public Defenders Office and others
Plaintiff:
Harrison Daniel Vance
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
