Cases 1 - 10 of 11
Harsco Corporation v. Occupational Safety and Health, et al
as 20-13464
Respondent:
OCCUPATIONAL SAFETY AND HEALTH ADMINISTRATION, U.S. DEPARTMENT OF LABOR and SECRETARY, U.S. DEPARTMENT OF LABOR
Petitioner:
HARSCO CORPORATION
Mobile Abrasives, Inc., et al v. U.S. Department of Labor
as 19-14720
Petitioner:
MOBILE ABRASIVES, INC. and HARSCO CORPORATION
Respondent:
U.S. DEPARTMENT OF LABOR
Gadsden Industrial Park LLC v. USA, et al
as 17-15325
Plaintiff - Appellant:
GADSDEN INDUSTRIAL PARK LLC
Defendant - Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, CMC INC. and HARSCO CORPORATION
Harsco Corporation v. CMC Inc
as 4:2017cv00565
Plaintiff:
Harsco Corporation
Defendant:
CMC Inc
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Mobile Abrasives, Inc. v. U.S. Department of Labor
as 17-10313
Petitioner:
MOBILE ABRASIVES, INC. and HARSCO CORPORATION
Respondent:
U.S. DEPARTMENT OF LABOR
:
SERVICE and SERVICE
Gadsden Industrial Park LLC v. United States of America et al
as 4:2015cv00956
Plaintiff:
Gadsden Industrial Park LLC
Defendant:
United States of America, CMC Inc and Harsco Corporation
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1346
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2015cv00166
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201
Gadsden Industrial Park LLC v. United States of America, The et al
as 4:2014cv00039
Plaintiff:
Gadsden Industrial Park LLC
Defendant:
United States of America, The, CMC Inc and Harsco Corporation
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Blasingame et al v. Harsco Corporation
as 5:2010cv00046
Plaintiff:
Winford Charles Blasingame, Sandra Blasingame, Harry Franklin Brook and others
Defendant:
Harsco Corporation
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2009cv01911
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
