Cases 1 - 10 of 29
Winrow v. Higgins et al
as 5:2013cv00546
Petitioner:
John Calvin Winrow, Jr
Respondent:
Haskell Higgins and Attorney General of the State of Oklahoma
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
McKnight v. Oklahoma State of et al
as 5:2013cv00527
Petitioner:
Tony L McKnight
Respondent:
Oklahoma State of, Haskell Higgins and Attorney General of the State of Oklahoma
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Toles v. Higgins et al
as 5:2013cv00273
Petitioner:
Johnnie R Toles
Respondent:
Haskell Higgins and Attorney General of the State of Oklahoma
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Prochaska v. Higgins et al
as 6:2011cv00059
Petitioner:
Raymond Prochaska
Respondent:
Haskell Higgins and Attorney General of the State of Oklahoma
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Prochaska v. Higgins et al
as 5:2010cv01385
Petitioner:
Raymond Prochaska
Respondent:
Haskell Higgins and Attorney General of the State of Oklahoma
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Lewis v. Higgins et al
as 5:2010cv01343
Plaintiff:
Joseph Lonnell Lewis
Defendant:
Haskell Higgins, Phil Gilstrap, Matt Hill and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Prochaska v. Higgins et al
as 5:2010cv01090
Petitioner:
Raymond Prochaska
Respondent:
Haskell Higgins and Attorney General of the State of Oklahoma
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Stauffer, Jr. v. Higgin
as 10-5106
Petitioner - Appellant:
CHARLES STAUFFER, JR.
Respondent - Appellee:
HASKELL HIGGINS, Warden
Jordan v. Higgins
as 6:2010cv00297
Petitioner:
Billy Thomas Jordan
Respondent:
Haskell Higgins
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Williams v. Anderson et al
as 6:2010cv00075
Plaintiff:
Ricky O. Williams
Defendant:
Ron Anderson, Jim Rabon, Bobby Boone and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
