Cases 1 - 8 of 8
Black Hawk Builders, LLC v. Epstein
as 1:2022cv10264
Plaintiff:
Black Hawk Builders, LLC
Defendant:
David Epstein doing business as DME Construction and Cincinnati Insurance, David Epstein doing business as DME Construction and Cincinnati Insurance
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1330 Breach of Contract
Maritime Preservation Ltd. v. Tarbox
as 17-1487
Plaintiff - Appellant:
MARITIME PRESERVATION LTD.
Defendant - Appellee:
BLACK HAWK SHIPPING ENTERPRISES, INC. and ROSALIE TARBOX
THE FIRST NA v. MARGARET TODD P/V et al
as 2:2015cv00066
Plaintiff:
THE FIRST NA
Defendant:
MARGARET TODD P/V, PATIENCE P/V, POLLY LIN II P/V and others
Cause Of Action: 46 U.S.C. § 31325
Maritime Preservation Ltd. v. Black Hawk Shipping Enterprises, Inc. et al
as 3:2013cv01728
Plaintiff:
Maritime Preservation Ltd.
Defendant:
Black Hawk Shipping Enterprises, Inc. and Rosalie Tarbox
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Hawke Capital Partners, L.P., et al v. Aeromed Services Corporation
as 3:2012cv01247
Plaintiff:
Hawke Capital Partners, L.P. , Keystone Med-Flight, LLC , Hawke Aircraft Holdings, Inc. and others
Defendant:
Aeromed Services Corporation
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Hiltz et al v. The Hawk Eye Fishing Corp.
as 1:2010cv10478
Plaintiff:
David Hiltz , Arthur Jost , Michael Machado and others
Defendant:
The Hawk Eye Fishing Corp.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1333 Admiralty
v. RED HAWK INDUSTRIES, LLC et al
as 1:2009cv11159
Defendant:
RED HAWK INDUSTRIES, LLC, RAHUL GHAI and HAROLD FOLSOM
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Petition for Removal
Blank Hawk Shipping Enterprises, Inc. v. American Waste Management & Recycling LLC et al
as 3:2008cv01136
Plaintiff:
Black Hawk Shipping Enterprises, Inc. and Black Hawk Shipping Enterprises, Inc.
Defendant:
American Waste Management & Recycling LLC and Cargo of Scrap Metal
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1333 Admiralty
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
