Cases 1 - 8 of 8
Genaville LLC v. Hayneedle Inc.
as 2:2015cv00872
Plaintiff:
Genaville LLC
Defendant:
Hayneedle Inc.
Cause Of Action: 35 U.S.C. § 271
Qommerce Systems, LLC v. Hayneedle Inc.
as 6:2015cv00183
Plaintiff:
Qommerce Systems, LLC
Defendant:
Hayneedle Inc.
Cause Of Action: 35 U.S.C. § 271
TQP Development, LLC v. Hayneedle, Inc.
as 2:2014cv00574
Plaintiff:
TQP Development, LLC
Defendant:
Hayneedle, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 35 U.S.C. § 271
eDekka LLC v. Hayneedle, Inc.
as 2:2014cv00445
Plaintiff:
eDekka LLC
Defendant:
Hayneedle, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 35 U.S.C. § 271
Parallel Networks, LLC v. Abercrombie & Fitch Co. et al
as 6:2012cv00018
Plaintiff:
Parallel Networks, LLC
Defendant:
Abercrombie & Fitch Co. , Amazon.com, Inc. , The Gap Inc and others
Counter_defendant:
Parallel Networks, LLC
Counter_claimant:
Netflix, Inc. , Office Depot, Inc. , The Gap Inc and others
Mediator:
Robert Faulkner
Consol_defendant:
Barnes & Noble, Inc. , barnesandnoble.com, LLC , Brawn, LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 35 U.S.C. § 271
Parallel Networks, LLC v. Adidas America, Inc. et al
as 6:2010cv00491
Defendant:
Victoria's Secret Direct Brand Management, LLC, bergdorfgoodman.com, LLC, Gillette Company The and others
Plaintiff:
Parallel Networks, LLC
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1126
Parallel Networks LLC v AEO, Inc.
as 6:2010cv00275
Defendant:
AEO, Inc., AEO Management Co., Amway Corporation d/b/a Amway Global and others
Plaintiff:
Parallel Networks LLC
Cause Of Action: 35 U.S.C. § 271
Parallel Networks, LLC v. Abercrombie & Fitch Co. et al
as 6:2010cv00111
Defendant:
Kayak Software Corporation, Orbitz Worldwide Inc, Yahoo! Inc and others
Consolidated Defendant:
JAG Footwear, Accessories and Retail Corporation, Onestop Internet, Inc., HSN LP and others
Plaintiff:
Parallel Networks, LLC
Not Yet Classified:
Richard Grainger, Michael McLemore and Robert W Faulkner
Cause Of Action: 35 U.S.C. § 271
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
