Cases 1 - 10 of 13
Ryan Dobbs v. Health IQ Insurance Services Inc
as 22-2588
Plaintiff / Appellant:
RYAN DOBBS, individually, and on behalf of all others similarly situated
Defendant / Appellee:
HEALTH IQ INSURANCE SERVICES INC
Mathews v. Health IQ Insurance Services, Inc. et al
as 3:2022cv02075
Plaintiff:
Rosalind Mathews
Defendant:
Health IQ Insurance Services, Inc. and John Does 1-10
Cause Of Action: 47 U.S.C. § 227 Restrictions of Use of Telephone Equipment
Marsh v. Health IQ Insurance Services, Inc.
as 2:2022cv00431
Plaintiff:
Alessandro Cameron Marsh
Defendant:
Health IQ Insurance Services, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 47 U.S.C. § 227 Restrictions of Use of Telephone Equipment
Norris v. Health IQ Insurance Services, Inc.
as 5:2022cv01236
Plaintiff:
Linda J. Norris
Defendant:
Health IQ Insurance Services, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 47 U.S.C. § 227 Restrictions of Use of Telephone Equipment
DOBBS v. Health IQ Insurance Services, Inc.
as 5:2021cv05276
Plaintiff:
RYAN DOBBS
Defendant:
Health IQ Insurance Services, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 47 U.S.C. § 227
DOBBS v. Health IQ Insurance Services, Inc.
as 2:2021cv05276
Plaintiff:
RYAN DOBBS
Defendant:
Health IQ Insurance Services, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 47 U.S.C. § 227
Misty Vaughan v. Health IQ Insurance Services, Inc.
as 5:2021cv01899
Plaintiff:
Misty Vaughan
Defendant:
Health IQ Insurance Services, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 47 U.S.C. § 227
Tyner v. Hi Q Inc
as 5:2021cv00608
Defendant:
Health IQ Insurance Services Inc and Hi Q Inc doing business as Health IQ Inc
Plaintiff:
Tara Armado and Maki Tyner
Cause Of Action: 47 U.S.C. § 227 Restrictions of Use of Telephone Equipment
Johnson v. Health IQ Insurance Services, Inc.
as 1:2020cv07522
Defendant:
Health IQ Insurance Services, Inc.
Plaintiff:
Rudell Johnson
Cause Of Action: 47 U.S.C. § 227
Pettis et al v. Health IQ Insurance Services, Inc.
as 5:2020cv08190
Defendant:
Health IQ Insurance Services, Inc.
Plaintiff:
Andrew Pettis and John Wyskida
Cause Of Action: 47 U.S.C. § 227
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
