Cases 1 - 10 of 33
Smith v. Regency Integrated Health Services, LLC et al
as 4:2024cv00390
Plaintiff:
Shanna Smith
Defendant:
Regency Integrated Health Services, LLC and Regency IHS Clinical Consulting, LLC
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1938 Fair Labor Standards Act
Baptist Hospitals of Southeast Texas v. Becerra
as 4:2023cv04799
Plaintiff:
Baptist Hospitals of Southeast, Ascension Providence, Ascension Seton d/b/a Ascension Seton Hays and others
Defendant:
Xavier Becerra
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1395 HHS: Adverse Reimbursement Review
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2023cv00452
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal- Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 6:2023cv00060
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 451 Employment Discrimination
Williams v. Devine Embrace Health Services, LLC et al
as 4:2023cv04102
Plaintiff:
Tomeka Williams
Defendant:
Devine Embrace Health Services, LLC and Violet Idokogo
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201 Denial of Overtime Compensation
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2021cv01205
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2020cv04001
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 754
Reyna v. Cascade Health Service, LLC
as 2:2020cv00151
Defendant:
Angela Reyna and Cascade Health Service, LLC, d/b/a Cimarron Place Health & Rehabilitation
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201
Cunningham v. 360 Health Services, LLC et al
as 4:2020cv00109
Defendant:
Nicholas Pape, Nicholas Jenkins, Dr. Howard Newman and others
Plaintiff:
Craig Cunningham
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2019cv03072
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
