Cases 1 - 10 of 63
Parsley v. Colvin et al
as 5:2023cv00253
Plaintiff:
Chad Parsley
Defendant:
G. Scott Colvin, Major Matt Lemonds, Hector Joyner and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Kelsey v. Lexington-Fayette Urban County Government et al
as 5:2023cv00229
Plaintiff:
Scott Michael Kelsey
Defendant:
Lexington-Fayette Urban County Government, Lisa Farmer, Rodney Ballard and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Ford v. Joyner et al
as 7:2023cv00034
Plaintiff:
Samuel B. Ford
Defendant:
Hector Joyner and USP Big Sandy, Director of Medical Services
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Bivens Act
Dixon v. Joyner et al
as 7:2023cv00030
Plaintiff:
Dijon T. Dixon
Defendant:
Hector Joyner, Gary Rose, E. A. Irwin and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Bivens Act
Strickland v. USA
as 7:2023cv00018
Petitioner:
Cain Hamilton Strickland
Respondent:
USA and Hector Joyner
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Lomax v. Joyner
as 7:2023cv00021
Petitioner:
Stanley Lomax
Respondent:
Hector Joyner
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Forbes v. Joyner et al
as 7:2022cv00116
Plaintiff:
Dennis A. Forbes
Defendant:
Hector Joyner, Lt. Minix, Erwin and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Bivens Act
Dixon v. Joyner
as 7:2022cv00118
Petitioner:
Dijon T. Dixon
Respondent:
Hector Joyner
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Torres v. Joyner
as 7:2022cv00111
Petitioner:
Javier Eduardo Torres
Respondent:
Hector Joyner
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Barfield v. Joyner
as 7:2022cv00107
Petitioner:
Maurice Barfield
Respondent:
Hector Joyner
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
