Cases 1 - 10 of 44
Davis v. Ansari, et al
as 23-6040
Plaintiff / Appellant:
EZEKIEL DAVIS
Defendant / Appellee:
SHADID ANSARI, GEO/LCF Medical Director, individually and in his official capacity, GEO GROUP CORRECTIONS, INC., AMBER MARTIN, Vice President of GEO Group, Inc., individually and in her official capacity and others
Markham v. Rios et al
as 5:2018cv01247
Defendant:
Christine Thomas, FNU LNU, David Cincotta and others
Plaintiff:
Floyd Markham, Jr
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Joseph v. Rios
as 5:2018cv00079
Plaintiff:
Victor Eugene Joseph
Defendant:
Hector Rios, Jr
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Joseph v. Rios
as 5:2018cv00022
Plaintiff:
Victor Eugene Joseph
Defendant:
Hector Rios, Jr
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Toles v. Oklahoma Department of Corrections et al
as 5:2017cv01049
Plaintiff:
Terrance Toles
Defendant:
Oklahoma Department of Corrections , David Louthan, Christian Moncivais and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Davis v. Martin, et al
as 17-6060
Plaintiff - Appellant:
EZEKIEL DAVIS
Defendant - Appellee:
AMBER MARTIN, JOHNNY BLEVINS, FNU WEEKS and others
Davis v. GEO Group Corrections, et al
as 17-6059
Plaintiff - Appellant:
EZEKIEL DAVIS
Defendant - Appellee:
GEO GROUP CORRECTIONS, INC., AMBER MARTIN, Vice President of GEO Group, Inc., individually and in her official capacity, HECTOR RIOS, JR., Warden, individually and in his official capacity and others
Adams v. Rios et al
as 5:2017cv00167
Plaintiff:
Chad Jeremy Adams
Defendant:
Hector Rios, Jr, GEO Group Inc, Dean Caldwell and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Davis v. Martin et al
as 5:2016cv01375
Plaintiff:
Ezekiel Davis
Defendant:
Amber Martin, Johnny Blevins, FNU Weeks and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Wofford v. Thomas et al
as 5:2016cv01308
Plaintiff:
Raymond Wofford, III
Defendant:
Christina Thomas and Hector Rios, Jr
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
