Cases 1 - 10 of 21
Cavalleri et al v. Hermes International, a French corporation et al
as 3:2024cv01707
Plaintiff:
Tina Cavalleri and Mark Glinoga
Defendant:
HERMS INTERNATIONAL, a French corporation and HERMS OF PARIS, INC., a New York corporation
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1 Antitrust Litigation
Hermes International v. Rothschild
as 23-1081
Plaintiff / Appellee:
Hermes International and Hermes of Paris, Inc.
Defendant / Appellant:
Mason Rothschild
Petitioner:
MSCHF, CTHDRL, Alfred Steiner and others
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2023cv20150
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12182 Americans with Disabilities Act
Skechers U.S.A., Inc. et al v. Hermes International et al
as 1:2022cv08862
Plaintiff:
Skechers U.S.A., Inc. and Skechers U.S.A. Inc. II
Defendant:
Hermes International, Hermes of Paris, Inc. and Defendant Does 1-10
Cause Of Action: 35 U.S.C. § 271 Patent Infringement
Hermes International et al v. Rothschild
as 9:2022mc81473
Plaintiff:
Hermes International and Hermes of Paris, Inc.
Defendant:
Mason Rothschild
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 44 Trademark Infringement
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2022cv22203
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12182 Americans with Disabilities Act
Hermes International et al v. Rothschild
as 1:2022cv00384
Plaintiff:
Hermes International and Hermes of Paris, Inc.
Defendant:
Mason Rothschild
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1114 Trademark Infringement (Lanham Act)
Higgins v. Hermes of Paris Inc et al
as 3:2021cv07335
Plaintiff:
Colin Higgins
Defendant:
Hermes of Paris Inc and Hermes International S.C.A.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2021cv21908
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Hermes of Paris, Inc. v. Swain
as 20-3451
Petitioner:
Hermes of Paris, Inc.
Respondent:
Matthew Swain
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
