Cases 41 - 50 of 72
Lomax v. Hoffman et al
as 1:2013cv02131
Plaintiff:
Arthur James Lomax
Defendant:
Morris B. Hoffman, Michael Anthony Martinez, Anne Marie Mansfield and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Hernandez v. Clements et al
as 1:2013cv00587
Petitioner:
Roy Hernandez
Respondent:
Tom Clements and Attorney General of the State of Colorado, The
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Stanley v. Clements et al
as 1:2012cv02944
Plaintiff:
Alexander Stanley
Defendant:
Tom Clements, Lucy Hernandez, Marshall Griffith and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Darris v. Brunning et al
as 1:2012cv01599
Plaintiff:
Stephan Darris
Defendant:
Brunning, (I) Brunning, Petit and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Hernandez v. Starman et al
as 1:2012cv00881
Petitioner:
Jesus John Hernandez
Respondent:
Joe Starman and United States Parole Commission
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Ramirez-Hernandez v. USA
as 1:2012cv00697
Respondent:
USA
Petitioner:
Gibran Jesus Ramirez-Hernandez
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255
Hernandez v. Banulos et al
as 1:2011cv02064
Plaintiff:
Roger R. Hernandez
Defendant:
M. Banulos, Whittny, Castro-Hess and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Hernandez v. Hartly et al
as 1:2011cv01953
Petitioner:
Anthony Hernandez
Respondent:
Steve Hartly and Attorney General of the State of Colorado, The
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Pickford v. Arapahoe County Sheriff's Department et al
as 1:2010cv03029
Plaintiff:
Leon C. Pickford
Defendant:
Arapahoe County Sheriff's Department, Grayson Robinson, Norris and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Rueb et al v. Zavaras et al
as 1:2010cv02725
Plaintiff:
Justin Rueb, Leroy Armijo, Rudy Ball and others
Defendant:
Aristedes Zavaras, Robert Allen, Eugene Atherton and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
