Cases 11 - 20 of 34
Makhoul v. Hewlett-Packard Company
as 9:2014cv80844
Plaintiff:
R John Makhoul
Defendant:
Hewlett Packard Company
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1132 E.R.I.S.A.-Employee Benefits
Fleming v. HEWLETT-PACKARD COMPANY
as 4:2015cv00018
Plaintiff:
Rachel Fleming
Defendant:
HEWLETT-PACKARD COMPANY
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 754
FLEMING v. HEWLETT-PACKARD COMPANY
as 4:2015cv00019
Plaintiff:
RACHEL FLEMING
Defendant:
HEWLETT-PACKARD COMPANY
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Ramos v. Hewlett-Packard Company
as 1:2014cv01942
Plaintiff:
Rafael Ramos
Defendant:
Hewlett-Packard Company
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 216
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2013cv00466
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000
The Progeni Corporation v. Electronic Data Systems Corporation et al
as 1:2013cv02456
Plaintiff:
The Progeni Corporation
Defendant:
Electronic Data Systems Corporation and Hewlett-Packard Company
Counter_claimant:
Hewlett-Packard Company and Electronic Data Systems Corporation
Counter_defendant:
The Progeni Corporation
Evans et al v. Hewlett Packard Company et al
as 2:2013cv14066
Plaintiff:
Ernest Evans , The Last Twist Inc and The Ernest Evans Corporation
Defendant:
Hewlett Packard Company and Palm Inc
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1127 Trademark Infringement
Cory v. Hewlett-Packard Company
as 3:2012cv00671
Plaintiff:
Jason Cory
Defendant:
Hewlett-Packard Company
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Hewlett-Packard Company et al v. Complete Distribution Services, Inc.
as 6:2012cv00657
Plaintiff:
Hewlett-Packard Company and Associated Global Systems, Inc.
Defendant:
Complete Distribution Services, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 49 U.S.C. § 14706
Hewlett-Packard Company v. CP Transportation, LLC et al
as 1:2012cv21258
Plaintiff:
Hewlett-Packard Company
Defendant:
CP Transportation, LLC and CP TRansport, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
