Cases 1 - 10 of 38
Live Nation Entertainment Inc v. Anthem Inc et al
as 2:2024cv00600
Defendant:
Blue Cross of Idaho Health Service Inc doing business as Blue Cross of Idaho (Idaho Health), Anthem Health Plans of Maine Inc doing business as Anthem Blue Cross Blue Shield of Maine (Anthem ME), Blue Cross of Northern California and others
Plaintiff:
Live Nation Entertainment Inc
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
JetBlue Airways Corporation et al v. Anthem Inc et al
as 2:2022cv00558
Plaintiff:
JetBlue Airways Corporation, JetBlue Airways Group Health Insurance Plan, Kraft Heinz Company, The and others
Defendant:
Anthem Inc formerly doing business as WELLPOINT INC, Blue Cross of California, Blue Cross of Southern California, Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 15 Antitrust Litigation
Bed Bath & Beyond Inc. et al v. Anthem Inc et al
as 2:2022cv01256
Plaintiff:
Bed Bath & Beyond Inc., Automobile Club of Southern California, Darling Ingredients Inc and others
Defendant:
Anthem Inc d/b/a ANthem Blue Cross LIfe and Health Insurance Company agent of WELLPOINT INC, Blue Cross of California, Blue Cross of Southern California and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Insurance Contract
ATLANTIC NEUROSURGICAL SPECIALISTS et al v. ANTHEM, INC. et al
as 2:2021cv20052
Plaintiff:
ATLANTIC NEUROSURGICAL SPECIALISTS, ATLANTIC SHORE SURGICAL ASSOCS., PC and ATLANTIC SHORE SURGICAL ASSOCIATES, PC
Defendant:
ANTHEM, INC., d/b/a Anthem Blue Cross Blue Shield, f/k/a WellPoint, Inc., ANTHEM INS. COS., INC., d/b/a Anthem Blue Cross Blue Shield, ANTHEM LIFE INS., d/b/a Anthem Blue Cross and Blue Shield and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1001 E.R.I.S.A.
Metropolitan Transportation Authority et al v. Blue Cross and Blue Shield of Alabama et al
as 2:2022cv00265
Defendant:
Anthem Inc formerly known as WELLPOINT INC doing business as Anthem Blue Cross Life and Health Insurance Company doing business as Blue Cross of California doing business as BLUE CROSS OF SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA doing business as Blue Cross of Northern C, Independence Health Group Inc and Independence Hospital Indemnity Plan Inc, Blue Cross and Blue Shield of Alabama and others
Plaintiff:
Metropolitan Transportation Authority, New York City Transit Authority, Manhattan And Bronx Surface Transit Operating Authority and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1 Antitrust Litigation
Metropolitan Transportation Authority et al v. Blue Cross and Blue Shield of Alabama et al
as 1:2021cv09101
Plaintiff:
Metropolitan Transportation Authority, New York City Transit Authority, Manhattan And Bronx Surface Transit Operating Authority and others
Defendant:
Blue Cross and Blue Shield of Alabama, PREMERA and Premera Blue Cross, Blue Cross and Blue Shield of Arizona, Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1
Reyes v. Blue Cross and Blue Shield of Alabama et al
as 2:2021cv01235
Plaintiff:
Mishanta Reyes
Defendant:
Blue Cross and Blue Shield of Alabama, Anthem Inc, Health Care Service Corporation and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 2
Pettus Plumbing & Piping Inc v. Blue Cross Blue Shield of Alabama et al
as 3:2016cv00297
Plaintiff:
Pettus Plumbing & Piping Inc
Defendant:
Blue Cross Blue Shield of Alabama, Premera Blue Cross also d/b/a Premera Blue Cross Blue Shield of Alaska, Blue Cross Blue Shield of Arizona and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Anti-trust
Caldwell v. Blue Cross and Blue Shield of Alabama et al
as 2:2019cv00565
Defendant:
Caring for Montannans, Inc., BlueCross BlueShield of Mississippi, Blue Cross and Blue Shield of Georgia, Inc. and others
Plaintiff:
Matthew B Caldwell
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1
MED-X GLOBAL, LLC v. WORLDWIDE INSURANCE SERVICES, LLC (T/N GEOBLUE) et al
as 3:2017cv11742
Plaintiff:
MED-X GLOBAL, LLC
Defendant:
WORLDWIDE INSURANCE SERVICES, LLC (T/N GEOBLUE) , HORIZON BLUE CROSS BLUE SHIELD OF NEW JERSEY , BLUE CROSS AND BLUE SHIELD OF FLORIDA, INC. (T/N FLORIDA BLUE) and others
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1132
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
