Cases 1 - 10 of 12
GILSRUD et al v. HIGHMARK BLUE SHIELD
as 2:2020cv00659
Defendant:
HIGHMARK BLUE SHIELD
Plaintiff:
KAREN GILSRUD and TIMOTHY GILSRUD
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1001
Rudnick v. Highmark Blue Shield et al
as 1:2016cv01484
Plaintiff:
Howard Rudnick
Defendant:
Highmark Blue Shield and The Milton S. Hershey Medical Center
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1001
ELITE ORTHOPEDIC & SPORTS MEDICINE PA v. HIGHMARK BLUE SHIELD
as 2:2015cv00582
Plaintiff:
ELITE ORTHOPEDIC & SPORTS MEDICINE PA
Defendant:
HIGHMARK BLUE SHIELD
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1132
ATLANTIC SPINAL CARE v. HIGHMARK BLUE SHIELD et al
as 2:2013cv03159
Plaintiff:
ATLANTIC SPINAL CARE
Defendant:
HIGHMARK BLUE SHIELD and ABC CORP.
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1001 E.R.I.S.A.: Employee Retirement
DR. BRIAN M. TORPEY, M.D., F.A.C.S. v. HIGHMARK BLUE SHIELD et al
as 3:2012cv06589
Plaintiff:
DR. BRIAN M. TORPEY, M.D., F.A.C.S.
Defendant:
HIGHMARK BLUE SHIELD and GANNETT FLEMING, INC.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1001 E.R.I.S.A.
JOHNSON v. HIGHMARK BLUE SHIELD
as 2:2012cv00612
Plaintiff:
MARY J. JOHNSON
Defendant:
HIGHMARK BLUE SHIELD
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1001
KINCAID v. NEXANS USA, INC et al
as 5:2010cv07385
Plaintiff:
SCOTT KINCAID
Defendant:
NEXANS USA, INC, HIGHMARK BLUE SHIELD and TROVER SOLUTIONS, INC
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1132
Brant v. Highmark Blue Shield
as 1:2010cv00220
Plaintiff:
Monique Brant
Defendant:
Highmark Blue Shield and Highmark Blue Shield
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1132 E.R.I.S.A.-Employee Benefits
CICIRETTI v. HIGHMARK BLUE SHIELD
as 2:2009cv00013
Plaintiff:
TIMOTHY J. CICIRETTI
Defendant:
HIGHMARK BLUE SHIELD
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
GELSDORF v. GELSDORF et al
as 2:2008cv00152
Plaintiff:
KELLIE GELSDORF
Defendant:
SCOTT GELSDORF, HIGHMARK BLUE CROSS AND BLUE SHIELD, HIGHMARK BLUE SHIELD and others
Cause Of Action: Notice of Removal - ERISA
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
