Cases 1 - 10 of 27
(PC) Ponce v. Ramadan et al
as 1:2023cv01193
Plaintiff:
Pablo Jesus Ponce
Defendant:
Ramadan and Hitchman
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Juan Vazquez v. E. Conannan, et al
as 21-16731
Plaintiff / Appellant:
JUAN R. VAZQUEZ
Defendant / Appellee:
E. CONANNAN, J. SILVEIRA, SRN II, G. KAMON, Medical Doctor and others
(PC) Welk v. CA Dept of Corrections et al
as 1:2021cv01494
Plaintiff:
Richard James Welk
Defendant:
CA Dept of Corrections, Rosemary Ndoh, D. Crenshaw and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
(PC) Welk v. CA Dept of Corrections et al
as 2:2021cv01799
Plaintiff:
Richard James Welk
Defendant:
CA Dept of Corrections, Rosemary Ndoh, D. Crenshaw and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
(PC) Welk v. California Department of Corrections et al
as 1:2021cv01476
Plaintiff:
Richard James Welk
Defendant:
California Department of Corrections, Rosemary Ndoh, D. Crenshaw and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
(PC) Welk v. California Department of Corrections et al
as 2:2021cv01786
Plaintiff:
Richard James Welk
Defendant:
California Department of Corrections, Rosemary Ndoh, D. Crenshaw and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Juan Vazquez v. E. Conannan, et al
as 21-16222
Plaintiff / Appellant:
JUAN R. VAZQUEZ
Defendant / Appellee:
E. CONANNAN, J. SILVEIRA, SRN II, G. KAMON, Medical Doctor and others
Defendant:
I. MATHOS, Nurse Practitioner
(PC) Hammer v. Ola et al
as 1:2020cv01828
Defendant:
Vijay Patel, H. Longia, Debby Maddox and others
Plaintiff:
Jeffrey Hammer
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
(PC) Apodaca v. Segriest et al
as 1:2019cv01781
Defendant:
S. Gates, Stephen Hitchman, Emmanuel Conanan and others
Plaintiff:
Aaron L. Apodaca
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
(PC) Padilla v. Patel et al
as 1:2019cv00837
Defendant:
P.A. Hitchman and Patel
Plaintiff:
Larry D. Padilla
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
