Cases 1 - 10 of 26
Bonilla v. Hite et al
as 4:2023cv06104
Plaintiff:
Steven Wayne Bonilla
Defendant:
Judge Christopher C. Hite and County of San Francisco
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Bonilla v. Chhabria et al
as 4:2023cv04540
Plaintiff:
Steven Wayne Bonilla
Defendant:
Judge Vince Chhabria, Chief Judge Richard Seeborg, Judge Joseph C. Spero and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2023cv03329
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2023cv00033
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2022cv05396
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1361 Petition for Writ of Mandamus
Dylan Higgins et al v. Ford Motor Company
as 2:2022cv04994
Plaintiff:
Holly Kane, Dylan Higgins, Jodie Hill and others
Defendant:
Ford Motor Company
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 2301 Magnuson-Moss Warranty Act
Saundra Hall et al v. Ford Motor Company
as 2:2022cv04975
Plaintiff:
Saundra Hall, Danielle Hamilton, Virginia Hamm and others
Defendant:
Ford Motor Company
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Fraud
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 5:2019cv01966
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101
Niagara Bottling Company, LLC v. Rite-Hite Company, LLC et al
as 5:2018cv02032
Defendant:
Rite-Hite Products Corporation, Rite-Hite Company, LLC, Elettric 80, Inc. and others
Plaintiff:
Niagara Bottling Company, LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Niagara Bottling, LLC v. Rite-Hite Corp. et al
as 5:2018cv01943
Plaintiff:
Niagara Bottling, LLC
Defendant:
Rite-Hite Corp., Arbon Equipment Corp. and Does 1-15, inclusive
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
