Cases 31 - 40 of 202
Childers v. The City of Hobbs et al
as 2:2021cv00056
Plaintiff:
Triston Ray Childers
Defendant:
The City of Hobbs, Joshua N Gordon and Seth M Ford
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Madkins v. City of Hobbs et al
as 2:2020cv01301
Defendant:
Juan Jaimes, Ruben Gastelum, Dustin Seay and others
Plaintiff:
Oliver Madkins
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
McClanahan v. Hobbs
as 2:2020cv00767
Respondent:
Annik Hobbs
Petitioner:
Shane McClanahan
Not Classified By Court:
Prisoner Litigation Unit
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Evans et al v. Williams et al
as 2:2020cv00874
Defendant:
April Vigil, Teresa Valdez, Angel Martinez and others
Plaintiff:
Forrest Evans, Ernestine Hodge and Rapido MVD Services
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Castanon et al v. Board of Education for the Hobbs Municipal School District et al
as 2:2020cv00852
Defendant:
Zeke Kaney, Board of Education for the Hobbs Municipal School District, TJ Parks and others
Plaintiff:
Carlos Castanon and Maria Castanon
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Shorter v. Carter et al
as 2:2020cv00800
Plaintiff:
Jessica Michelle Shorter
Defendant:
Hobbs Municipal Court, City of Hobbs and Shannon Carter
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Peacock v. Lea County Detention Facility et al
as 2:2020cv00437
Defendant:
Hobbs Police Department, Lea County Sheriff's Department, Lovington Police Department and others
Plaintiff:
Joshua N Peacock
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Dechant v. Grayson et al
as 2:2020cv02183
Defendant:
Calvin Pfannensteil, Jr., James Grayson, Does 1 to 10 and others
Plaintiff:
Larry Dechant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
OPENED IN ERROR
as 2:2020cv00272
Plaintiff:
Tileasha Wright and Unknown Persons
Defendant:
City of Hobbs and Rudy Hille
Cause Of Action: 00 U.S.C. § 0000
Wright v. City of Hobbs et al
as 2:2020cv00273
Plaintiff:
Tileasha Wright
Defendant:
Dustin Seay, City of Hobbs and Rudy Hille
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
